Search for: "Burden v. Burden" Results 8561 - 8580 of 31,121
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Mar 2019, 9:27 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Court then reinstates the claim brought by a disabled worker who was harassed because of his disability.The case is Fox v. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 9:10 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
One Lot Emerald Cut Stones v. [read post]
1 May 2013, 6:13 pm by Rumpole
 Rumpole practice tip #19: Be aware of Wilson v. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 8:07 am by Guest Blogger
”  Note that this latter version of “bad intent” was not the sort addressed by Arlington Heights or Washington v. [read post]
18 Mar 2014, 8:29 am
In the main, the Court found defendant’s objections were without merit, or went to the credibility of Thomas’s testimony, which were to be tested not by preclusion but by “[v]igorous cross-examination, presentation of contrary evidence, and careful instruction on the burden of proof,” which “are the traditional and appropriate means of attacking shaky but admissible evidence. [read post]
21 Jul 2016, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Membership in the NYS Employees’ Retirement System for 10 years is not necessarily the same as the member having 10 years of member service creditCaetano v DiNapoli, 2016 NY Slip Op 05222, Appellate Division, Third DepartmentSharon Caetano, an employee of the Erie County Board of Elections, experienced a “slip and fall” while at work. [read post]
1 Aug 2023, 10:08 am by Zijian Han
” The Federal Circuit held that meeting the burden requires some combination of “citing the relevant record evidence with specificity and explaining the significance of the produced material in briefs. [read post]
24 Oct 2023, 11:15 am by Joshua Weisenfeld
” The Federal Circuit further noted that “[w]hile it is a petitioner’s burden to show … that any proposed substitute claims are unpatentable … it is Sisvel’s burden … to show that the proposed amendment complies with the relevant regulatory and statutory requirements. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 12:57 am by INFORRM
The Judge then noted that neither side had a burden to discharge and that section 12 of the Human Rights Act 1998 required the Applicants to demonstrate that they were likely to succeed at trial [11] and [12]. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 4:20 am by Susan Brenner
  It also noted that Christie, who bore the “burden of proof on her motion", produced evidence “suggesting her case or the others could have been transferred to another available agent. [read post]
16 Oct 2017, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
However, emphasising that the burden falls on the claimant in an Internet libel action to prove substantial publication, the Court concluded that Mr Tamiz had not shown substantial publication [88]-[89]. [read post]