Search for: "Study v. State"
Results 8561 - 8580
of 15,013
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Apr 2014, 1:12 pm
The case of Obrey v. [read post]
27 Apr 2014, 9:39 am
LEXIS 57335 (MD PA, April 23, 2014), a Pennsylvania federal district court dismissed a Muslim inmate's complaint that his free exercise rights were infringed when his books were confiscated and discarded, preventing him from studying his religion.In JCG v. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 3:00 pm
In the other case, United States v. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 1:14 pm
The key conclusions of this study are that: (1) copyright is key to US economy; (2) there is no need for a complete re-write of the 1976 Copyright Act; and (3) a good copyright system and a vibrant internet are not at odds with each other. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 11:42 am
Also in UMG Recordings, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 8:17 am
(In Re: Actos [Pioglitazone] Products Liability Litigation, MDL Docket No. 2299, No. 6:11-md-2299, Allen v. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 8:17 am
(In Re: Actos [Pioglitazone] Products Liability Litigation, MDL Docket No. 2299, No. 6:11-md-2299, Allen v. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 1:45 am
You can study IP wherever you want to now with increased specialization. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 9:01 pm
Anthony List v. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 4:58 pm
In the beginning I had little interest in the Oscar Pistorius trial; only after reading descriptions of Gerrie “The Bull Dog” Nel’s cross-examination of Pistorius (OP) did I pay attention. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 8:47 am
At the oral argument in CTS Corp. v. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 6:59 am
Professor Barnett builds his radically individualistic view of popular sovereignty on Chisholm v. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 6:08 am
Yesterday, the Court upheld the sentence in the case of United States v. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 4:00 am
Using the example of R. v. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 10:33 am
State voters may amend a state's constitution to prohibit consideration of racial preferences with respect admission to colleges and universities if it does not reflect a racially discriminatory purpose Schuette v. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 10:02 am
“Judges accept, with little or any discussion, the submissions or evidence that identifying class members is ‘cost-prohibitive,’” it states. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 7:30 am
Interestingly, Much of the argument concerned a 2009 ruling, Wyeth v. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 4:30 am
The case was Simpson v. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 10:45 am
The plaintiff in Jennings v. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 10:11 am
Korzen, director of the Appellate Advocacy Clinic at the Wake Forest University School of Law, will make his Supreme Court debut in CTS Corp. v. [read post]
