Search for: "ELI LILLY & CO." Results 841 - 860 of 1,004
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Feb 2011, 4:11 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Eli Lilly & Co., 598 F.3d 1336, 1351 (Fed. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 10:38 am by Eric
Eli Lilly & Co., 233 F.3d at 465 (noting that the defendant's references to the plaintiff's trademark (PROZAC®) in its website source codes was evidence of wrongful intent to divert Internet users searching for information on PROZAC® to the defendant's website). [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 5:13 pm by James Yang
  As such, the Federal Circuit distinguished the instant case from Eli Lilly & co. v. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 8:51 am by Michelle Yeary
Eli Lilly & Co., 2010 WL 348276, at *11 (E.D.N.Y. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 4:00 am by Ted Folkman
Compare In re Application of Eli Lilly & Co. [read post]
16 Apr 2022, 2:49 pm by Dennis Crouch
Eli Lilly & Co., 8 F.4th 1349 (Fed. [read post]
20 May 2012, 1:11 pm
 On the face of it, Plavix's patent expiry may have arguably paved the way for Eli Lilly & Co's and AstraZeneca's own blood-thinning drugs, Effient and Brilinta respectively, to gain more market share but the expiry of the patent does not mean that increasing the market share of their competitor drugs will be easy. [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 1:05 am
The appellate court upheld the Texas federal district court ruling that granted summary judgment to Eli Lilly on the grounds that the plaintiff's doctor informed him of the risks of taking Zyprexa. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 12:19 pm by Schachtman
Eli Lilly & Co., No. 06-0874, 2009 WL 2208570, *19 (D.N.M. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 2:02 pm
Eli Lilly & Co., 119 F.3d 1559, 1566 (Fed. [read post]