Search for: "L.J.-I." Results 841 - 860 of 1,239
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Apr 2011, 5:00 am by J Robert Brown Jr.
  As the court described:  I begin from the premise that absent a sufficient reason not to apply the attorney-client privilege, that privilege would attach to the interim report. [read post]
17 Apr 2011, 8:38 am by Lawrence Solum
The best advice I can give for approaching this debate is to be careful about how the conceptual territory is mapped and the terms are defined. [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 3:22 am
At this point the story is taken up by the IPKat's friend Marlou L.J. van de Braak (who incidentally was acting for Gimv): "Before the Cancellation Division the case was decided on the basis of Gimv’s earlier trade name rights, but considered that there had been no genuine use of Gimv's earlier trade marks. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 5:39 pm
L.J., Case Number D057493/Opinion Published April 6, 2011 On April 6, 2011, the California Fourth Appellate District, Division One, in a strongly (and painfully) worded opinion reversed a San Diego trial judge's refusal to permit a father to relocate with the parties' four-year old son to the State of Washington to join his new wife and her family. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 5:14 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
There is usually no need to disclose extra material, which would otherwise be a trade secret.However, I never include claims when I file a provisional application. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 9:15 am by Schachtman
Causation,” I discussed the lack of scientific basis for confusing and conflating risk and cause. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 10:00 am by Betsy McKenzie
Well, besides Judge Posner's poison valentine, The Bluebook Blues, 120 Yale L.J. 850 (2011), there have been a number of blog posts recently reacting to the article. [read post]
27 Feb 2011, 4:05 am by SHG
  That's what I was taught in law school. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 7:02 am by Larry Ribstein
” Although I see much that’s useful in Olson’s provocative book, I have two qualifications or criticisms. [read post]