Search for: "Means v. State"
Results 841 - 860
of 61,629
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Nov 2011, 9:47 am
KMPG LP v. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 5:18 pm
In State v Price, Mr. [read post]
5 May 2016, 8:00 am
United States v. [read post]
5 May 2016, 8:00 am
United States v. [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 3:00 am
Disclosure: Prescriptive v. [read post]
24 Aug 2017, 1:34 am
This was the subject of an interim decision of Roth J. earlier this month in the Competition Appeal Tribunal: Secretary of State for Health and Others v Servier Laboratories Limited and Others [2017] EWHC 2006 (Ch) (available here). [read post]
With Carpenter v. United States, Supreme Court Edges Fourth Amendment Doctrine into the 21st Century
27 Jun 2018, 12:25 pm
The post With Carpenter v. [read post]
With Carpenter v. United States, Supreme Court Edges Fourth Amendment Doctrine into the 21st Century
27 Jun 2018, 12:25 pm
The post With Carpenter v. [read post]
5 Dec 2023, 1:07 am
In this post, Liz Jackson, Trainee Solicitor, and Max Wiktorsson, Associate, in the Employment Team at CMS preview the decision awaited from the Supreme Court in Secretary of State for Business and Trade v Mercer. [read post]
13 Feb 2019, 11:54 am
State v. [read post]
21 Jan 2009, 8:33 pm
Spears was found guilty of conspiracy to distribute at least 50 grams of cocaine base and at least 500 grams of powder cocaine. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 9:00 pm
In United States v. [read post]
24 Apr 2013, 1:28 pm
A week ago today, the United States Supreme Court heard oral arguments in a Texas case called Salinas v. [read post]
1 Sep 2012, 9:30 am
The brief and a summary of its argument are available here: In 2010, the Supreme Court decided United States v. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 5:02 am
Citing People v Weaver (12 NY3d 433) and United States v Jones (132 S Ct 945}, the Court of Appeals ruled that the State agency's action was a search within the meaning of the State and Federal Constitutions and “did not require a warrant” but “on the facts of this case such surveillance was unreasonable”The decision TLC decision is posted on the Internet… [read post]
15 Aug 2017, 7:49 am
Rev. 1149**As to state law and patents-->To support this position, the court looked to Jim Arnold Corp. v. [read post]
23 Nov 2018, 2:14 pm
Implied, but insufficiently stated in the article, is the fact that the “mindfulness technology” was invented by humans, in order to address a perceived market for tools to help resist distractions. [read post]
When Congress says "and" they mean "and." And that likely means safety-valve relief for quite a few.
18 Jun 2021, 5:01 pm
United States v. [read post]
2 Aug 2013, 9:48 am
Department of State (“DOS”) has now issued FAQs for handling of same-sex spouses in both the immigrant (green card) and nonimmigrant (temporary visa) categories, following the Supreme Court’s finding, in Windsor v. [read post]
23 Feb 2017, 11:00 am
Life Technologies v. [read post]
