Search for: "State v. Burden" Results 841 - 860 of 22,155
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Aug 2022, 12:18 pm
For example, Florida's Religious Freedom Restoration Act  provides that the state “shall not substantially burden a person’s exercise of religion, even if the burden results from a rule of general applicability,” absent a showing by the state that the challenged application of the law law furthers a compelling government interest and is the least restrictive means of furthering that interest. [read post]
12 Dec 2019, 5:45 am by Kevin Kaufman
Key Findings Following the 2018 South Dakota v. [read post]
30 Mar 2009, 1:16 pm
On Tuesday morning, the Court will hear argument in Gross v. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 10:05 am by Big Tent Democrat
The Attorney General of Missouri has filed an amicus brief (PDF) in the case before the Eleventh Circuit, State of Florida, et al. v. [read post]
4 Oct 2017, 4:38 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Since plaintiff did not meet his initial burden, the burden did not shift to defendant to raise an issue of fact (see Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 NY2d 320, 324 [1986]). [read post]
5 Jul 2019, 3:43 pm by Minick Law
Further, the State has the burden to prove that consent was, in fact, freely and voluntarily given. [read post]
13 Apr 2014, 7:09 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Schoenefeld’s fundamental right to practice law and that the state “failed to establish either a substantial state interest advanced by [the statute], or a substantial relationship between the statute and that interest” [Schoenefeld v. [read post]
24 May 2015, 1:47 pm
Although state guidelines vary on these requirements, this is generally true across the board in all 50 states. [read post]
21 Mar 2022, 2:46 am by Jan Jacobi
These questions were recently answered in a ruling by the CJEU in the Globus v. [read post]