Search for: "State v. Hart " Results 841 - 860 of 1,154
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Sep 2015, 12:31 am by Stephen Page
It seems to me that is not the most desirable state of affairs. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 8:00 am by Guest Blogger
  Until relatively recently, Article V and the hurdles it presented to formal constitutional amendment was seen as a feature rather than a bug, especially if one credited the constitutional theories of esteemed scholars like David Strauss or Bruce Ackerman. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 8:17 am by Sanford Levinson
  To be sure, Bickel was more than willing  to defend Brown v. [read post]
30 Oct 2020, 5:32 am by Will Baude
The Bank of the United States no longer exists, but M'Culloch v. [read post]
15 Jan 2023, 10:18 pm by Michael Douglas
Unlike the position in some of the State Supreme Courts,[2] leave to serve outside Australia[3] was required before service (FCR r 10.43(2)). [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 12:25 am by Graeme Hall
RU (Bangladesh) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 651 (08 June 2011): No error of law deporting Bangladeshi man convicted of complicity in shooting. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 11:40 am by Lorelie S. Masters and Paul T. Moura
B [2010] EWHC 1626 (Comm), paras [25-31] (court rejected challenge based upon tribunal’s failure to apply Spanish law); Ruby Roz Agricol LLP v The Republic of Kazakhstan [2017] EWHC 439 (court declined to apply expansive interpretation of Kazakh law).5See English Arbitration Act 1996, Section 69; Enterprise Insurance Company Plc v U-Drive Solutions (Gibraltar) Limited [2016] EWHC 1301 (QB) (court lacked jurisdiction over appeal because Section 69 conditions were not met,… [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 11:40 am by Lorelie S. Masters
B [2010] EWHC 1626 (Comm), paras [25-31] (court rejected challenge based upon tribunal’s failure to apply Spanish law); Ruby Roz Agricol LLP v The Republic of Kazakhstan [2017] EWHC 439 (court declined to apply expansive interpretation of Kazakh law).5See English Arbitration Act 1996, Section 69; Enterprise Insurance Company Plc v U-Drive Solutions (Gibraltar) Limited [2016] EWHC 1301 (QB) (court lacked jurisdiction over appeal because Section 69 conditions were not met,… [read post]
6 May 2013, 5:38 am by INFORRM
There were a handful of resolved cases reported:  Full Fact v The Sun, Clause 1, 06/05/2013; Mr David Murray v Sutton Guardian, Clause 1, 03/05/2013; A woman v The Sun on Sunday, Clause 9, 03/05/2013; and Dr Carol Uren v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 03/05/2013. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 4:54 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
Thus, the defendants established the element of irreparable injury”] [citation omitted]; and Matter of Brenner v Hart Sys., Inc., 114 AD2d 363 [2d Dept 1985] [“irreparable injury would result from a denial of the motion because Brenner would then be voted out of office by the other shareholders”]). [read post]
30 Oct 2022, 5:54 pm by INFORRM
United States The satirical publication The Onion has filed an amicus curiae brief with th [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 8:20 am by Joy Waltemath
., with no exception for weekends, a federal district court in New York granted the plaintiffs’ motion in limine precluding the defendants from changing course in the eleventh hour and arguing otherwise to minimize damages (Hart v. [read post]