Search for: "US v. Mark Stephens" Results 841 - 860 of 1,174
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Oct 2011, 4:21 am by Marie Louise
US Supreme Court hears arguments in a case concerning the shrinking public domain: Golan v Holder (IP Whiteboard) Rihanna – Be inspired, but too much will cost you – Settlement reached after court opinion finding Rihanna’s‘S&M’ video infringed David La Chapelle’s copyright (Innovationpartners)   US Trademarks USPTO Issues 8th Edition of TMEP (TTABlog) Fourth quarter trademarks dashboard overview (Director’s Forum)  … [read post]
23 Oct 2011, 5:55 pm by INFORRM
The witnesses were Jack Straw MP, Lord Wakeham, Sir Stephen Sedley, and Professor Gavin Phillipson. [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 5:23 am by Aaron Tang
Our first topic of the week is Florence v. [read post]
9 Oct 2011, 4:00 pm by VMaryAbraham
Stephen Wolfram says that Jobs stood out for his astonishing clarity of thought. [read post]
8 Oct 2011, 8:16 pm by VMaryAbraham
 (His remarks start at the 7:30 minute mark.) [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 4:37 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
We decline to address the best mode issue.Additionally, Stephen P. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 5:15 am by Rob Robinson
(Your Secrets Are Safe Here) - http://bit.ly/rgPGAS (Ralph Losey) When You Know, You Know: Cache La Poudre Feeds LLC v. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 12:18 am by INFORRM
  In the US investigations are continuing. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 6:08 am by Rob Robinson
Compiled from online public domain resources, provided for your review/use is this week's update of key industry news, views, and events highlighting key electronic discovery related stories, developments, and announcements. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 5:10 pm by INFORRM
Stephens (22 July 2011) an Ohio trial court judge held that there is no First Amendment right to bark at a police dog. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 12:25 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Individuals tend to fare worse (.65 v. .74 for use, .27 v. .37 for ITU). [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 4:04 pm by David Lat
Of the 1,400 people who have voted thus far in our reader poll, only 34 percent would vote “guilty” if they were jurors in the case of State v. [read post]