Search for: "United States v. Flood" Results 841 - 860 of 1,137
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Oct 2011, 11:07 am by Randy Barnett
S. 606 et seq.; United States v. [read post]
24 Sep 2011, 6:13 am by Christa Culver
Certiorari stage documents:Opinion below (9th Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Petitioner's reply United States Steel Corp. v. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 1:25 pm by WIMS
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Washington. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 2:04 pm by WIMS
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 8:15 am by admin
When the cellular phone emerged as a consumer product in the 1980s, it operated in 800 MHz frequencies, for which the FCC initially gave away two licenses for 40 MHz of spectrum in each of the 306 market areas in the United States – one to a wireless provider and one to a wired provider. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 7:37 am by New Books Script
[Toronto, Ont. : Magistrates' Courts], 1965 KF 224 B568 B53 1965 V.4 Regina vs. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 9:41 am by Mike Scarcella
Srinivasan, chair of O’Melveny’s appellate and Supreme Court practice, said the panel decision, if it is not overturned, “threatens to unleash a flood of litigation in U.S. court for actions lacking any salient connection to the United States. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 8:59 am by Conor McEvily
In a blog post for the Washington Post, Ezra Klein discusses Douglas v. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 9:49 am
The National Conference of State Legislatures estimates that if the debt ceiling is not raised by August 2, the United States will have only $12 billion to pay its $32 billion of obligations. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 10:06 am by The Legal Blog
Opening door for a further appeal could be opening a flood gate which will cause more wrongs in the society at large at the cost of rights. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 4:00 am by Nathaniel Grow
The documentary, which premiered last night, chronicles Curt Flood's historic legal challenge to baseball's reserve clause and antitrust exemption, culminating in the United States Supreme Court's 1972 decision of Flood v. [read post]