Search for: "Unknown Defendant No. 1"
Results 841 - 860
of 2,511
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Apr 2019, 5:59 am
The current regulations define the term Achild‑custody proceeding@ as Aany action, other than an emergency proceeding, that may culminate in@ foster‑care placement, termination of parental rights, preadoptive placement, and adoptive placement (25 CFR 23.2[11][1]). [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 12:47 pm
It’s well established that an indictment for sale of a controlled substance must allege the name of the person to whom the defendant sold the drugs or that the recipient’s name is unknown. [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 4:40 pm
After years of negotiation, the parties settled: the insurer agreed to pay more than $4 million and Witasick agreed to release known, unknown, and future claims. [read post]
4 Aug 2015, 11:27 am
Obviousnesscannot be predicated on what is unknown. [read post]
14 Aug 2009, 8:03 am
Instead, Sawyer relied on a small and obscure Japanese study with an unknown work environment, and without explaining the scientific reason for doing so. [read post]
14 Aug 2009, 8:03 am
Instead, Sawyer relied on a small and obscure Japanese study with an unknown work environment, and without explaining the scientific reason for doing so. [read post]
14 Aug 2009, 8:03 am
Instead, Sawyer relied on a small and obscure Japanese study with an unknown work environment, and without explaining the scientific reason for doing so. [read post]
1 Feb 2021, 4:00 am
Many accused defendants plead guilty to avoid expensive and time-consuming trials. [read post]
5 Feb 2010, 2:00 pm
OUTCOME/IMPACT of EVENT: UNKNOWN EFFECT/CORRECTIVE ACTION: Departments 1-MEDICAL/ONCOLOGY Q QA/Risk Management 2-INTENSIVE CARE UNIT FOLLOW-UP CATHY GRAY RN Pt was admitted to let floor at 1740. [read post]
4 Aug 2015, 11:06 am
If we misunderstand these changes, we welcome your reply. 1. [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 5:13 am
’ Fed.R.Evid. 404(a)(1). [read post]
16 Aug 2017, 3:30 am
Therefore, when the plaintiff did not show up to work on August 1, 2014, the defendant considered the plaintiff to have voluntarily resigned her employment. [read post]
5 Aug 2016, 2:35 am
Goodman (Professor, Rutgers Law School) ProPublica’s story on “machine bias” in an algorithm used for sentencing defendants amplified calls to make algorithms more transparent and accountable. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 2:13 am
., Fireman’s Fund Insurance Company, Allianz Insurance Company, Defendants, 2023 Cal. [read post]
16 Jun 2008, 11:30 am
The court also gave short shrift to defendants' argument based on the acknowledgment contained in Littman's release, of claims and information "unknown", stating that while such language may be effective in an arm's length business transaction, it does not preclude a claim against a fiduciary with a duty to disclose "all material facts bearing on the transaction". [read post]
15 Oct 2018, 4:55 pm
” The court also held that it had pendent jurisdiction to decide whether: (1) good cause was required before the civilian attorneys could be excused from representing Al-Nashiri; (2) there was good cause to excuse SDC; (3) Brig. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 5:09 am
Rachit Buch is a pupil barrister at 1 Crown Office Row Chambers. [read post]
16 Nov 2017, 1:36 pm
Clients should provide my office with the following 1. [read post]
26 Oct 2017, 4:52 am
The applicant had relied on three jurisdictional gateways: (1) where a claim is for an interim remedy under s. 25(1) of the Civil Jurisdiction and Judgments Act 1982 (PD 6B, para. 3.1(5)), (2) where a claim is made for an injunction ordering the defendant to do or refrain from doing an act within the jurisdiction (PD 6B, para. 1(2)) and (3) where the claimant wishes to serve the claim form on another person who is a necessary or proper… [read post]
5 Nov 2016, 2:34 am
In the pre-action disclosure ruling, HHJ Moloney QC observed that potential claimants contemplating defamation litigation against unknown authors face extreme difficulty when assessing their likelihood of success, by virtue of the requirement to satisfy the “serious harm” threshold of section 1 Defamation Act 2013. [read post]
