Search for: "V D" Results 841 - 860 of 76,322
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Apr 2017, 9:00 pm by Laurent Teyssèdre
Ingénieur Brevets spécialisé dans le domaine des sciences du vivant (H/F) – Lieu LYON - CDI EGYP LYON recherche un(e) ingénieur(e) Brevets titulaire d’un diplôme d’ingénieur ou d’un doctorat, dans le domaine des sciences du vivant, notamment en biologie humaine / végétale, idéalement diplômé(e) de l’EQE ou en cours. [read post]
18 Sep 2016, 9:00 pm by Laurent Teyssèdre
Ceva Santé Animale recherche: Un(e) Ingénieur(e) Brevets Junior  Missions:  Accompagné(e) d’un référent senior, vous assurerez les missions suivantes dans le domaine des médicaments vétérinaires: o Recherche d’art antérieur sur des bases de données brevets et littérature scientifique o Analyse et sélection de documents pertinents d’art… [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 2:05 am by sally
Regina v N(A); Regina v Le [2012] EWCA Crim 189; [2012] WLR (D) 38 “The implementation of the United Kingdom’s obligation to comply with article 26 of the Council of Europe Convention on Action Against Trafficking in Human Beings 2005 would normally be achieved by the proper exercise of the long established prosecutorial discretion which enabled the Crown Prosecution Service, however strong the evidence might be, to decide that it would be inappropriate to… [read post]
6 Aug 2023, 2:08 pm by Joel R. Brandes
 [France][Petition granted][ Mother’s motion for reconsideration denied] Peyre v McGarey, 2023 WL 4351544 (D. [read post]
6 Aug 2023, 2:06 pm by Joel R. Brandes
 [Ireland][ motion to appoint a guardian ad litem denied] McElliott v McElliott 2023 WL 4764816  (D. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 8:41 am by Steven R. Morrison
I'm looking forward to the Supreme Court's ruling in Elonis v. [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 10:46 am by Jack D
Le prix forfaitaire des opérations de dépannage par un garagiste agréé des véhicules d’un poids total autorisé en charge inférieur à 3,5 tonnes est fixé à 114,50 euros toutes taxes comprises. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 2:20 am by sally
PR (Sri Lanka) v Secretary of State for the Home Department; SS (Bangladesh) v Same; TC (Zimbabwe) v Same [2011] EWCA Civ 988; [2011] WLR (D) 276 “The two tiers of the tribunal system operating in respect of immigration and asylum cases were, and were plainly to be regarded as, competent to determine whether there was a compelling reason why the particular issue on which an applicant’s claim which had failed twice before that system should be subjected… [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 3:26 am by sally
Regina (Guardian News and Media Ltd) v City of Westminster Magistrates’ Court; Guardian News and Media Ltd v Government of the United States of America and another [2011] EWCA Civ 1188; [2011] WLR (D) 309 “The Court of Appeal had jurisdiction to hear a proposed appeal from a decision of a court conducting extradition proceedings (which were criminal in nature), where that decision related to a matter which was wholly collateral to the extradition proceedings… [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 2:24 am by sally
Mayhew v King and others; Chaucer Insurance plc (Part 20 claimant) v Folgate London Market Ltd (formerly Towergate Stafford Knight Co Ltd) (Part 20 defendant) [2011] EWCA Civ 328; [2011] WLR (D) 117 “A clause in a settlement agreement relieving the paying party from its obligation to make payment to the receiving party in the event of the latter’s insolvency infringed the ‘anti-deprivation principle’ which prevented the making of a valid contract… [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 1:48 am by sally
Cecil and others v Bayat and others [2011] EWCA Civ 135; [2011] WLR (D) 51 “The claimants in a proposed action for breach of contract and damages were not entitled unilaterally to decide to postpone service of their claim form out of the jurisdiction under CPR 7.6(1). [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 3:35 am by sally
Chambers v Director of Public Prosecutions [2012] EWHC 2157 (Admin); [2012] WLR (D) 234 “A message which did not create fear or apprehension in those to whom it was communicated, or who may reasonably have been expected to see it, was not of a ‘menacing character’ within the meaning section 127(1)(a) of the Communications Act 2003. [read post]