Search for: "State v. W"
Results 8641 - 8660
of 15,630
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Oct 2013, 9:01 pm
The policy was upheld in the October 22, 2013 decision of the First Department in Jennings v. [read post]
26 Oct 2013, 10:59 pm
In Kurwa v. [read post]
25 Oct 2013, 5:23 am
[W]hile Lopez and Harris saw [Puesan] using all three of those computers . . . neither could see what he was doing with [them]. . . . [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 9:01 pm
Georgia and McClesky v. [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 10:26 am
Equally fortunately, I can confidently state that none of the programs we will be discussing today were within my purview when I was at the Department of Homeland Security. [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 1:40 pm
Attachments: FILED 10.22.13 Cariou v. [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 7:03 am
The anti-retaliation provision of the Dodd-Frank Act does not extend beyond U.S. soil, a federal district court in New York ruled, dismissing the retaliation claims of a China-based compliance officer for a German corporation’s Chinese subsidiary (Liu v Siemens, A.G., October 21, 2013, Pauley, W, III). [read post]
22 Oct 2013, 11:28 am
W-9). [read post]
22 Oct 2013, 10:34 am
By bringing together relevant stakeholders, the Forum aids in identifying trends, challenges and good practices in the implementation of the Guiding Principles by States and business enterprises, as well as by other stakeholders, including challenges faced in particular sectors, operational environments or in relation to specific rights or groups." [read post]
22 Oct 2013, 7:50 am
A federal district court in New Jersey granted a technology staffing company’s motion to set aside a DOL Administrative Review Board determination that the company willfully failed to comply with H-1B notice-posting requirements at required work sites (CAMO Technologies, Inc v Solis, October 18, 2013, Martini, W). [read post]
21 Oct 2013, 4:00 am
In his Preface to the fourth edition, Arthur W. [read post]
21 Oct 2013, 12:28 am
The post In the Supreme Court w/c 21 October 2013 appeared first on UKSC blog. [read post]
19 Oct 2013, 8:53 pm
W. [read post]
18 Oct 2013, 8:30 am
JERRY W. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 9:01 pm
The Justice Department’s analysis states that since the Supreme Court’s 1910 ruling in Hass v Henkel and its 1924 ruling in Hammererschmidt v. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:41 pm
In criminal context, see United States v. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 12:19 pm
But alas, two weeks later,on 23 September, while the CJEU was still engaged in its deliberation, another SPC referral struck home, once again from those persistent persons from E & W, in Actavis v Boehringer [2013] EWHC 2927 [inexplicably not posted on BAILII, but you can read this Kat's copy is here]. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 10:32 am
Nevertheless, contractors should still run a regression analysis on their current pay data, advised employment law attorney Brian W. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 10:03 am
”); United States v. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 9:35 am
JACKSON v. [read post]
