Search for: "Sees v. Sees"
Results 8661 - 8680
of 121,943
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jun 2011, 11:56 am
”), and Cooley v. [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 8:44 am
Up until this case, that position had support in domestic law (see AL (Serbia) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2008] UKHL 42, [2008] 4 All ER 1127; R (Hooper) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2005] UKHL 29, [2006] 1 All ER 487; and R (S) v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire [2004] UKHL 39, [2004] 4 All ER 193). [read post]
5 Oct 2012, 6:28 pm
In Davis v. [read post]
9 Jul 2024, 4:00 am
The Federal Circuit’s recent decision in LKQ Corp. v. [read post]
29 Mar 2014, 4:16 am
Gustovarac v Croatia App. [read post]
29 Mar 2014, 4:16 am
Gustovarac v Croatia App. [read post]
23 Aug 2013, 8:00 pm
See also Thomas v. [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 3:26 pm
Hulu does cite Bell Atlantic v. [read post]
22 Nov 2013, 5:19 am
” See Watson v. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 4:32 pm
Thornton and Cook v. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 2:05 pm
In this podcast, Rush describes some of the problems he sees with indigent defense in Shelby County, fifty years after Gideon v. [read post]
8 Oct 2013, 2:34 pm
Hopefully, the Fourth Department's recent decision in People v. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 8:14 am
(See prior posting.)Zhang Jingrong v. [read post]
20 Jun 2013, 11:35 am
See, e.g., Jackson v. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 4:56 am
See Superior Indus., LLC v. [read post]
31 Dec 2020, 10:28 am
” Lambertsen v. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 12:13 pm
VirginiaLoving v. [read post]
8 Mar 2013, 4:00 am
It should be remembered, however, that an individual’s request for reconsideration of a “final administrative determination” neither tolls the running of the statute of limitations [see Lavin v Lawrence, 54 AD3d 412] nor extends the statute of limitations [see Raykowski v NYC DOT, 259 AD2d 367] for the purposes of perfecting an appeal. [read post]
7 May 2024, 6:00 am
.), entered December 22, 2022, which denied the petition to annul respondents' determination, dated November 10, 2021, denying petitioner's application for accidental disability benefits (ADR), and dismissing the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78, unanimously affirmed, without costs.Petitioner did not sustain his burden of showing that his injuries resulted from an accident within the meaning of Administrative Code of City of NY § 13-252, rather than the foreseeable… [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 12:12 pm
VirginiaLoving v. [read post]
