Search for: "United States v. Circuit Judges" Results 8661 - 8680 of 16,272
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jun 2023, 11:58 am by Kelly Holden
The United States Supreme Court decided a case in favor of arbitration agreements, which is a win for employers. [read post]
16 May 2018, 5:30 am by Dennis Crouch
Cal. 2018) A district judge recently issued a decision that—if affirmed by the Federal Circuit—could have major implications for design patent law and policy. [read post]
22 Feb 2019, 2:41 pm by Eugene Volokh
Delahanty, 129 F.3d 20, 26 (1st Cir. 1997)(holding courthouses, particularly courtrooms, are nonpublic forums); United States v. [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 7:27 am by John Elwood
Sorrell, that the 9th Circuit opinion already explicitly addressed; finally denying review on the much-relisted Gundy v. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 2:02 pm by Lyle Denniston
  The trial went forward without broadcast, but with the proceedings videotaped; in August, Judge Walker struck down the ballot measure under the federal Constitution; the case is now pending on appeal in the Ninth Circuit (Perry, et al., v. [read post]
3 May 2012, 2:11 pm by admin
United States, a highly publicized case in which Sholom Rubashkin, the former operator of a kosher slaughter house, was sentenced to 27 years in prison in 2009 for 86 counts of financial fraud. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 6:36 am by cassieq
Ruiz, Jr. was the first Hispanic attorney to argue before the United States Supreme Court in Buck v. [read post]
17 Jul 2013, 4:47 pm by Steve Sady
Supreme Flashback Dear Flashback:The Ninth Circuit in a split en banc opinion concluded that sentencing judges could use the modified categorical approach to find a “missing element” where an indivisible statute – a statute not divisible into different elements to state different offenses – described a non-generic predicate offense. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 2:08 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
’” Ctr. forAuto Safety, 809 F.3d at 1096 (quoting United States v.Amodeo, 71 F.3d 1044, 1048 (2d Cir. 1995)); see also ValleyBroad. [read post]