Search for: "STATE V. POWERS"
Results 8681 - 8700
of 41,393
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Nov 2019, 8:55 am
Qualcomm disagreed then, and still disagrees now, with the FTC that a Section 2 Sherman Act violation can be established based on conduct that reasonably appears capable of making a significant contribution to maintaining monopoly power--which was the standard in United States v. [read post]
2 Dec 2015, 6:21 am
Quoting Foley, the Bluman Court stated, “‘[A] State’s historical power to exclude aliens from participation in its democratic political institutions [is] part of the sovereign’s obligation to preserve the basic conception of a political community. [read post]
16 Dec 2014, 2:01 pm
Here's an interesting development in the case of United States v. [read post]
27 Jul 2016, 9:01 pm
Was this omission pandering to religious powers in opposition to the common good? [read post]
21 Nov 2022, 7:57 am
by Dennis Crouch SoClean v. [read post]
15 Oct 2011, 8:40 am
The Court majority in Printz v. [read post]
18 Sep 2015, 11:19 am
United States, 851 F.2d 1372 (Fed. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 8:28 am
Stevens argued that under the adequate and independent state ground doctrine, the Court did not have the power to review the Florida state court’s decision. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 10:46 am
Sebelius, holding that the mandate is a valid exercise of Congress’ taxing power. [read post]
19 Oct 2018, 6:00 am
If substantial evidence supports the administrative tribunal's decision, a reviewing court may not substitute its judgment for that of the tribunal Haug v State Univ. of N.Y. at Potsdam, 2018 NY Slip Op 06964, In deciding Haug v State University of New York at Potsday [Potsdam], a case involving student discipline, the Court of Appeals commented on some issues relevant to the standard of proof required to support an administrative tribunal's… [read post]
19 Oct 2018, 6:00 am
If substantial evidence supports the administrative tribunal's decision, a reviewing court may not substitute its judgment for that of the tribunal Haug v State Univ. of N.Y. at Potsdam, 2018 NY Slip Op 06964, In deciding Haug v State University of New York at Potsday [Potsdam], a case involving student discipline, the Court of Appeals commented on some issues relevant to the standard of proof required to support an administrative tribunal's… [read post]
23 Feb 2018, 5:37 am
" While law enforcement officials have been known to abuse their power, the Court says, "and there is always a risk that an office charged with care of confidential information will spring a leak . . . , totalitarian tendencies do not lurk behind every instance of a state's collection of information about those within its jurisdiction. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 6:59 am
Cabell v. [read post]
7 Jan 2014, 8:43 am
McDermott and Jenkins v. [read post]
21 Apr 2017, 5:30 am
” The panel declined to do so, explaining that "a three-judge panel of this Court lacks the power to overturn Circuit precedent. [read post]
19 Oct 2018, 6:00 am
If substantial evidence supports the administrative tribunal's decision, a reviewing court may not substitute its judgment for that of the tribunal Haug v State Univ. of N.Y. at Potsdam, 2018 NY Slip Op 06964, In deciding Haug v State University of New York at Potsday [Potsdam], a case involving student discipline, the Court of Appeals commented on some issues relevant to the standard of proof required to support an administrative tribunal's… [read post]
1 Feb 2015, 12:26 pm
Doktor, and Rodman v. [read post]
27 May 2017, 1:56 pm
Once a candidate becomes President, however, the Constitution vests that individual with the awesome power of the executive office while simultaneously imposing constraints on that power. [read post]
26 Aug 2016, 11:16 am
Last night, in a case that produced four opinions from the seven-member Court, a sharply divided Illinois Supreme Court affirmed the trial court’s judgment in Hooker v. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 4:15 am
Heller represented MCM v. [read post]
