Search for: "US LEGALIZATION INC." Results 8681 - 8700 of 29,606
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jul 2009, 5:57 am
(Laurence Kaye on Digital Media Law) ACS:Law and Logistep currently seeking settlement from around 6000 alleged file-sharers but ISPs doubt accuracy of evidence (TorrentFreak) We should have embraced Napster says BPI boss Geoff Taylor in op-ed piece for BBC (Ars Technica)   United States US General – Decisions 9th Circuit: Anti-spyware company protected by 47 USC 230(c)(2): Zango v Kaspersky Lab (Technology & Marketing Law Blog)   US Patents How… [read post]
16 Aug 2023, 10:52 am by Kevin LaCroix
Supreme Court agreed to take up a case to consider the legality of the SEC’s use of in-house administrative tribunals, which the agency uses to enforce the federal securities laws. [read post]
28 Dec 2017, 2:45 am by Marc Whipple
Marketing Displays, Inc. that you cannot use trade dress to create “perpetual patents. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 8:32 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Precision IBC, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 11:14 am by Bianca Pietracupa (CA)
The Superior Court of Quebec has reaffirmed that a confusing domain can land your business in legal trouble. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 11:14 am by Bianca Pietracupa (CA)
The Superior Court of Quebec has reaffirmed that a confusing domain can land your business in legal trouble. [read post]
26 Dec 2019, 6:52 am by Rob Robinson
Based on an aggregate review of the abridged listing through the lens of Q4 2019, the following findings, data points, and tracking charts may be useful for understanding M&A+I activity patterns in the eDiscovery ecosystem from October 1, 2019, through December 26, 2019. [read post]
11 Dec 2006, 7:28 am
"Ben's Bread" from "Uncle Ben's" used for rice products (Uncle Ben's, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 3:54 am by Edith Roberts
Lexmark International, Inc., a case asking “whether Lexmark can use a customer license to block a remanufacturer like Impression from buying and refurbishing used Lexmark toner cartridges” that “would require the Supreme Court to choose between two competing views of patent rights. [read post]