Search for: "MAY v. US "
Results 8761 - 8780
of 120,387
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Nov 2018, 7:19 am
Third-party use is “relevant to show that a mark is relatively weak and entitled to only a narrow scope of protection,” Palm Bay Imps., Inc. v. [read post]
19 Jun 2011, 6:06 pm
Now, in an unique moment of silence, of which it is sure to be interrupted, the AmeriKat has set out the tail of the Stanford v Roche patent assignment case, which was decided by the US Supreme Court on 6 June 2011. [read post]
23 May 2012, 3:25 pm
May 23, 2012, by Meyers Nave The Supreme Court has voted unanimously to grant review of the First District Court of Appeal's controversial decision in Berkeley Hillside Preservation v. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 7:40 pm
The judge based his ruling on the two-part test from the US Supreme Court decision last year in New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. [read post]
13 Feb 2015, 7:59 am
Inc. v. [read post]
6 Jun 2014, 5:01 am
Court of Appeals has just made clear in Alphonso Owens v. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 1:22 pm
Roberts, 2012 US Dist. [read post]
7 May 2014, 6:00 am
Ford however filed a new intent-to-use application on May 29, 2013 for MODEL T for “automobiles”. [read post]
13 Sep 2008, 11:38 am
(Here's a link that may or may not lead directly to the article; I had to register with SSRN before I could get it to work.) [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 6:10 pm
In May, the US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit held the admissions policy did not disparately impact Asian American students with discriminatory intent, citing 2021’s admitted class included an uptick in low-income Asian American students. [read post]
16 May 2018, 10:10 am
In this pair of opinions, most of the parties’ claims against each other survived, paving the way for a messy trial.GhostBed, Inc. v. [read post]
19 May 2011, 2:29 pm
May 17, 2011). [read post]
28 Oct 2008, 4:00 pm
To download a copy of the Appellate Division's decision, please use this link: Matter of Ciaprazi v. [read post]
16 Dec 2019, 4:00 am
In Nationwide Property and Casualty Insurance v. [read post]
20 Jun 2007, 2:50 pm
" Army Regulation 27-26 (1 May 1992) (emphasis added). [read post]
31 Dec 2019, 6:56 am
Frac Serv. v. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 9:47 am
A.C. v. [read post]
4 Feb 2012, 6:29 am
Milward v. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 2:08 pm
Even absent a license, the music may be protected by fair use. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 2:15 am
•Using a wireless router in your room; others may share illegal material through your router, giving the appearance that you are the guilty party. [read post]
