Search for: "Actavis"
Results 861 - 880
of 1,010
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jun 2018, 2:26 pm
Actavis that went to the US Supreme Court. [read post]
25 Jun 2019, 9:28 am
Little did the PatKat know, but she wasabout to get a message from the Dutchcourt saying that all may not be well in theland of equivalenceThe pemetrexed saga has, by now, obtained a hit-series-like status, with new decisions coming regularly and even more decisions yet to come. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 11:33 am
| Applying the Actavis questions to numerical limitations: Regen Lab v Estar | Formstein defence in the UK? [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 7:09 am
: English translation of Dutch Supreme Court decision in MSD v Teva highlights UK Supreme Court's Actavis decision I Student essays: how to write a good piece? [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 7:59 am
The event blurb reads:"Jurisdictional issues have increasingly come to the fore in IP disputes in recent years, from Lucasfilm v Ainsworth and Actavis v Eli Lilly to FRAND disputes such as Unwired Planet v Huawei, Apple v Qualcommand Conversant v Huawei & ZTE, as parties clash on forum-shopping and attempts to reach one-stop resolution of their IP disputes. [read post]
15 Feb 2016, 8:25 am
He joined Chief Justice Robert's eBay concurrence emphasizing the long tradition of injunctive relief in patent cases, and he joined the Chief's Actavis dissent, which would have given pharmaceutical patentees broad immunity from antitrust law for "reverse payment" settlements. [read post]
24 Jan 2017, 12:06 pm
Actavis, 133 S. [read post]
25 Dec 2017, 4:06 am
: English translation of Dutch Supreme Court decision in MSD v Teva highlights UK Supreme Court's Actavis decision I Student essays: how to write a good piece? [read post]
27 Nov 2018, 3:19 am
Image Credits: In NYCPREVIOUSLY ON NEVER TOO LATENever Too Late 204 [Week ending 28 Oct] Court of Appeal reaffirms UK as SEP litigation hotspot in upholding Birss J in Unwired Planet | Much Ado About FRAND: What you need to know about today's Court of Appeal Unwired Planet decision | AIPPI UK Rapid Response Event: Unwired Planet v Huawei - 13 November at 6PM | Lord Kitchin applies the "markedly different" infringement approach in Actavis v Eli Lilly in Icescape v… [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 9:24 am
******************PREVIOUSLY, ON NEVER TOO LATE Never too late 50 [week ending on Sunday 7 June] - Swiss claims | Italian-sounding trade marks for cosmetics | “IP litigation and Enforcement” event | Saving WiFi | Spy scandal at the EPO | Rihanna v DC Comics | KitKat trade mark | Taste trade marks in the Netherlands | Connectivity and human rights | Trade secrets, client confidentiality and privilege | 3-d printing and counterfeiting | Ericsson v Apple in the… [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 3:51 am
| The IPKat and his friends | GO Outdoors Ltd v Skechers USA Inc II | Allfiled UK Ltd v Eltis & 16 Others | OAEE 'victims' mark in Greece | Icons, flags and the Hazzards of intellectual property toxicity | Why Finland is not Silicon Valley | The Sofa Workshop Ltd v Sofaworks Ltd | The Ukulele Orchestra of Great Britain v Clausen & Another (t/a the United Kingdom Ukulele Orchestra) | Sony/ATV Music Publishing LLC & Another v WPMC Ltd… [read post]
15 Sep 2015, 1:39 am
.* BREAKING NEWS Full decision out in the Lyrica case, and it's a whopperDarren breaks the news of the issuance of Mr Justice Arnold's first instance judgement following the full trial in the long-running case of Mylan and Actavis v Warner-Lambert (case management decision here, Court of Appeal decision here and here, and four first instance decisions here, here, here and here).* The debate over "Concussion": Is… [read post]
27 Nov 2021, 2:24 am
With a focus on common law jurisdictions, the author considers issues in cases of online IP disputes, including the Actavis v Lilly case, a textbook case in private international law textbooks.Irene Calboli then discusses in Chapter 3 the classic research method of IP scholars – comparative legal analysis. [read post]
11 May 2015, 3:05 pm
******************PREVIOUSLY, ON NEVER TOO LATENever too late 44 [week ending on Sunday 3 May] – Forgotten principles and histories, and the role of complexity in patent law | King's College copyright distance learning Course | Spain, Berne, and the non-discrimination principle | Novartis v Focus, Actavis, Teva | SUEPO keeps demonstrating | Popcorn's blocking injunction | Unprecedented pre-action disclosure application in Arnoldian Big Bus v… [read post]
25 May 2015, 4:15 am
******************PREVIOUSLY, ON NEVER TOO LATENever too late 46 [week ending on Sunday 17 May] – Whyte & MacKay Ltd v Origin Wine UK Ltd and Dolce Co Invest Inc | "Three aspects of information: Current issues in trade secrets, client confidentiality and privilege" -- a new event | CJEU upon distribution right in Dimensione Direct Sales srl and Michele Labianca v Knoll International SpA| UK Supreme Court on Mere reputation and passing-off | 14… [read post]
16 May 2014, 8:58 am
So this moggy is enormously grateful to his EIP colleague Matthew Jones, for preparing a report of this case, which came out at the same time as the Actavis v Lilly decision. [read post]
13 Apr 2019, 12:25 pm
| Applying the Actavis questions to numerical limitations: Regen Lab v Estar | Formstein defence in the UK? [read post]
19 Jun 2024, 6:31 am
https://lnkd.in/gYZvx6sN Order with permanent effect counted as “temporary injunction”. 230078.pdf (txcourts.gov) Contracts that paid generic drug makers both for delay in competing with brand name drug maker and for providing other “goods and services” didn’t stink enough to state a reverse-payment antitrust claim under Actavis. 23-410_opn.pdf (uscourts.gov) De novo test applies to review of ruling on motion to dismiss derivative claim. 223027p.pdf… [read post]
11 Jan 2019, 4:00 am
In the UK, the Supreme Court in 2017 released its decision in Actavis UK Ltd v Eli Lilly & Co [2017] UKSC 48 which allowed for variants in claim construction. [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 9:54 am
Did the fact that there were at least three decisions at the EPO that flatly claimed the Aerotel approach was wrong mean that the Court of Appeal should now change its mind, as it recently did in Actavis v Merck? [read post]
