Search for: "Doe v. Brown University" Results 861 - 880 of 1,131
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 May 2010, 7:54 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
He applied for an internship to McLean Hospital in Massachusetts in January and tried to get into both Yale and Brown as a transfer student. [read post]
16 Jan 2025, 11:11 am by John Elwood
Harvie Wilkinson reasoned that, even after Bruen, the Second Amendment does not protect a right to own assault weapons. [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 7:37 pm by Ezra Rosser
(Re)Emerging Issues The Seattle/Louisville Decision and the Future of Race-Conscious Programs Philip Tegeler Separate ≠ Equal: Mexican Americans Before Brown v. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 3:05 pm by LundgrenJohnson
This does not include every word, utterance, or movement—far from it. [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 2:22 am by INFORRM
On 28 March 2023, there was a hearing in the case of Brown v Channel 5. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 7:00 am by Guest Blogger
Consider, for instance, the end of the Court’s per curiam opinion in Bush v. [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 2:01 pm by John Elwood
In his petition, McCarthy maintains that the clause does not foreclose all judicial review and that other constitutional provisions, such as the quorum clause, indicate that physical attendance is a constitutional requirement. [read post]
12 Jun 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
The rule change got Justice Amy Coney Barrett through the Senate, but it also got Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson through. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 9:15 pm by Sri Medicherla
” Justice Sotomayor, writing in dissent, argued that the majority undermined the promise of racial equality at the heart of Brown v. [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 9:05 pm by Max Masuda-Farkas
The memorandum does not explain how to identify census responses by undocumented immigrants. [read post]
4 Mar 2025, 8:16 am by Above the Law
Ed. note: Please welcome Renee Knake Jefferson to the pages of Above the Law. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 1:36 pm
’ paper by Graeme Clark SC (IP Down Under) Full Federal Court decision concerning brand reputation in context of ‘lookalike’ products and famous brands: Hansen Beverage Company v Bickfords (Australia) Pty Ltd (Mallesons Stephen Jaques) Federal Court holds that grace period applicable to a ‘parent patent’ is different to that of its divisional ‘child’: Mont Adventure Equipment v Phoenix Leisure Group (IP Down… [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 2:02 pm by Jeffrey Kahn
Yesterday the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit released its opinion in Latif v. [read post]