Search for: "State v. C. J. W." Results 861 - 880 of 1,432
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jan 2013, 11:46 am by Schachtman
United States, No. 79 C 2148, 1983 U.S. [read post]
27 Jan 2013, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
The Court decided that: (i) D pays C’s costs on the standard basis up to 16 Dec 2010 (ii) There be no order of costs between 17 Dec 2010 and 10 April 2011 (owing to the temporary withdrawal of the offer) (iii) C pays D’s costs after that date on the standard basis, including the costs of the trial and appeal. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
The member states are furthermore in a position to balance conflicting rights and interests, such as the right of freedom of expression under Article 10 of the Convention with the right of property as protected by Article 1 of the First Protocol to the Convention. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 11:09 am by Wells Bennett
Fresh from the Guantanamo security scrub: an amended docketing order for the upcoming hearing, late this month, in United States v. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 5:55 am by Barbara Bavis
  Further, the United States Supreme Court recently heard arguments in Vance v. [read post]
19 Dec 2012, 4:08 pm by Jack McNeill
Reproductive choice in the hands of the state: the right to abortion under the European Convention on Human Rights in light of A,B & C v. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 7:21 am
Judge stopped father's evidence, stating that he had failed to show cause to support a change of residence. [read post]
21 Oct 2012, 10:13 am by admin
A Protectionist Country Blocks Two More Big Deals, Petronas Rejection Casts Doubt on CNOOC $15.1 Billion Bid, Market braces for Petronas fallout, Mulcair Slams Feds on Handling of Petronas Deal, Petronas Deal on Hold Not Dead. ____________________ For more information about our regulatory law services contact us: contact For more regulatory law updates follow us on Twitter: @CanadaAttorney Preferences Preferences Preferences Preferences Preferences Preferences … [read post]