Search for: "State v. K. D."
Results 861 - 880
of 2,573
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jul 2007, 4:29 am
We'd like to keep it that way. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 2:00 am
Fifth Circuit United States v. [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 7:34 am
For example, just a few years later, in Hall v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 3:47 am
That’s one of the issues on appeal from the 8th District’s decision last December in State v. [read post]
1 Oct 2017, 4:24 pm
S-K states in pertinent part that in its periodic reports to the SEC, a company is to “[d]escribe any known trends or uncertainties that have had or that the registrant reasonably expects will have a materially favorable or unfavorable impact” on the company. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 5:56 pm
§6662(d). [read post]
10 Aug 2016, 5:36 pm
It rejected Arendi’s argument, relyingon K/S HIMPP v. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 6:40 pm
Marchello K. [read post]
1 Feb 2021, 6:30 am
For the Symposium on Mary Ziegler, Abortion and the Law in America: Roe v. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 3:52 am
Malone and State v. [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 6:36 am
§10.85(k), “[a] statement or advice given by an FDA employee . [read post]
17 Feb 2017, 4:43 pm
K. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 12:00 pm
In Lance v. [read post]
27 May 2016, 3:48 am
E & K. [read post]
31 Oct 2010, 4:01 pm
The Guidelines for examination in the EPO (D-V 3.3) contain the statement that “if information is made available by means of a written description and use or by means of a written and oral description, but only the use or the oral description is made available before the relevant date, then in accordance with C-IV, 6.1, the subsequently published written description may be deemed to give a true account of that oral description or use, unless the proprietor of the patent can… [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 11:27 am
Supreme Court decision in Williams v. [read post]
22 Dec 2019, 10:18 am
An example of this circumstance is the case of Bauer v. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 7:54 am
Diljit K. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 6:54 pm
Supp. 2d 1345, 1367 (S.D.Fla.2011), aff’d, Chapman v. [read post]
16 Sep 2017, 6:59 am
Tenth Circuit Rules §3583(k) Unconstitutional Last month the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals, in United States v. [read post]
