Search for: "ADOPTION OF S E"
Results 8801 - 8820
of 15,180
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Nov 2013, 12:45 pm
"Los daños causados por la actividad judicial legítima del Estado no generan derecho e indemnización", dice el art. 5º in fine. [read post]
21 Nov 2013, 3:08 am
“Como todos sabemos, la Ley 54 reconoció el problema de violencia doméstica en Puerto Rico y adoptó como política pública repudiarlo enérgicamente. [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 7:41 pm
My article, "Transnational Corporations' Outward Expression of Inward Self-Constitution: The Enforcement of Human Rights by Apple, Inc." has just been published and will appear in the Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 20(2):805-879 (2013). [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 7:26 pm
Instead, it is more comfortable for all if the intelligence community adopts as many of the court’s suggestions as it can and explains why it can’t adopt the others. [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 2:37 pm
” The court suggests that her interpretation might have been different under prior versions of FISA, but says that the current version supports the reading adopted in the opinion. [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 9:24 am
Fannie Mae has done squat to push e-closings, so hopefully CFPB will take the lead in this important area! [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 4:48 am
On November 2, 2011, a jury convicted Jack E. [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 4:19 am
Regulation E changed it to an opt-in system, so consumers have to sign up for it. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 5:57 pm
Id. at *28-29 (text added).Holdings[1: Irreparable Harm] [W]e reject Apple’s arguments and confirm that the district court was correct to require a showing of some causal nexus between Samsung’s infringing conduct and Apple’s alleged harm [because causal nexus is an necessary part of the irreparable harm inquiry that must be satisfied, irrespective of the type of product encompassed by the patent]. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 8:11 am
Founder/CEO, Project Counsel I am not the only one who started thinking about the potential e-discovery implications of IBM’s announcement last week. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 10:23 pm
Delay adoption of rules that would modernize poultry inspection for the first time in almost 60 years until plants address space and technology concerns. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 3:07 pm
Today, magazines and newspapers such as the NRA’s American Rifleman, the Sierra Club’s Sierra, the Knights of Columbus’ Columbia, the United Methodist Church’s Newscope, the Roman Catholic Diocese of Oakland’s The Catholic Voice, and the Southern Christian Leadership Conference’s SCLC Magazine follow this tradition. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 4:00 am
The Board then adopted a resolution establishing a new preferred eligible list listing the names of two other teachers as having greater seniority in the tenure area than Marsico. [read post]
17 Nov 2013, 10:01 pm
But in Peru, upper-end restaurants sell beef hearts as an entrée. [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 12:30 pm
On 25 October 2013, China’s Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress of the People’s Republic of China passed an amendment to modernise the Law on Protection of Consumer Rights and Interests (Consumer Protection Law), the first overhaul since it’s adoption in 1993. [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 8:33 am
” In his statement, Secretary Vilsack said that Hagen’s “hard work and sound leadership” has lead to a food supply that is “safer today than ever before,” referencing the adoption of a zero-tolerance policy for additional strains of E. coli in beef and new standards to protect Americans from Salmonella and Campylobacter in poultry. [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 6:00 am
Well, parties adopting the Appellate Rules might want to think twice about skipping the stenographer. [read post]
13 Nov 2013, 4:59 pm
[W]e recognize that this action today will complicate our ability to support UNESCO’s programs. [read post]
13 Nov 2013, 2:59 pm
s general change of venue provisions. [read post]
13 Nov 2013, 5:35 am
Stock Exch., Inc., 503 F.2d 560 (2d Cir.1974) which adopted the district court’s conclusion that the J & E Rule was not unconstitutionally vague because “[a]s an experienced registered representative, plaintiff may be fairly charged with knowledge of the ethical standards of his profession . . . [read post]
