Search for: "Sees v. Sees" Results 8841 - 8860 of 121,939
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jan 2012, 7:31 am
” OCGA § 53–3–18 (1997) (current version at OCGA § 53–5–24 (2011)); see Harvey v. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 9:06 am by jpfaff
But since Withrow doesn’t cite any empirical evidence to bolster its claim, I don’t see why it is entitled to any deference for its empirical statements. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 6:19 am by Brian Shiffrin
SomesAssistant Monroe County Public DefenderJim's Eckert recently posted a column on consecutive sentences on misdemeanors (see). [read post]
11 Jun 2024, 5:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"On a motion to dismiss pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(7), the complaint must be afforded a liberal construction, the facts therein must be accepted as true, and the plaintiff must be accorded the benefit of every possible favorable inference" (Angeli v Barket, 211 AD3d 896, 897; see Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, 87). [read post]
22 Apr 2016, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Johnson was not entitled to a statement of the reason for the termination of her probationary employment, citing York v McGuire, 63 NY2d 760.Accordingly, said the court, Supreme Court properly granted the appointing authority’s motion to dismiss Johnson’s petition.* See, for example, 4 NYCRR 4.5(b) of the Rules of the State Civil Service Commission. [read post]
11 Jun 2024, 5:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"On a motion to dismiss pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(7), the complaint must be afforded a liberal construction, the facts therein must be accepted as true, and the plaintiff must be accorded the benefit of every possible favorable inference" (Angeli v Barket, 211 AD3d 896, 897; see Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, 87). [read post]