Search for: "Doe 35"
Results 8901 - 8920
of 17,232
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jun 2014, 10:08 pm
The written description is a statutory requirement set forth in 35 U.S.C. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 3:02 pm
On p. 35, the handbook states that “some states have decided to grant protection until 2067. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 3:02 pm
On p. 35, the handbook states that “some states have decided to grant protection until 2067. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 3:02 pm
On p. 35, the handbook states that “some states have decided to grant protection until 2067. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 1:58 pm
On p. 35, the handbook states that “some states have decided to grant protection until 2067. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 12:53 pm
What does this mean. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 12:20 pm
Crowd-Sourced Editorial Content and Fan Productions [Note: this is accidentally on purpose the perfect encapsulation of the move to monetize fandom: Four dudes sitting on a panel and telling me the history of fan fiction.]Moderator: Jay Kogan, DC EntertainmentA few years ago we talked about fan productions, new business models. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 11:14 am
Section 229 does not reach Bond’s simple assault. [read post]
8 Jun 2014, 9:38 pm
[H]e states that while the unambiguous language of § 141 does not explicitly provide for such delegation, the section does not explicitly bar it either [read post]
7 Jun 2014, 5:38 am
The following is a more detailed analysis by my partner, Richard (Rick) Josepher: WHAT DOES ZWERNER CASE MEAN TO PRACTITIONERS AND TO TAXPAYERS CONSIDERING MAKING VOLUNTARY DISCLOSURES OF OFFSHORE ACCOUNTS WHERE PENALTIES ARE NOT DETERMINED UNDER FORMAL OFFSHORE DISCLOSURE PROGRAMS? [read post]
6 Jun 2014, 6:06 pm
Platt also stated that the absolute risk in and of itself does not tell us anything about what might have happened in a specific case absent clinical and mechanistic explanations for that specific case. [read post]
6 Jun 2014, 1:33 pm
” Under Federal Circuit case law, liability for direct infringement under 35 U.S.C. 271(a) requires performance of all steps of a method patent to be attributable to a single party. [read post]
6 Jun 2014, 12:08 pm
See footnotes 35 and 36. [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 9:30 am
[1] 35 U.S.C. 112, Paragraph 2 [2] Star Scientific, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 7:30 am
If the NSA does not determine a target’s foreignness, it will not stop spying on that target. [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 7:20 am
They were to be registered in respect of “Class 33: ‘Alcoholic beverages (except beers)” and related services in classes 35 and 39. [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 4:15 am
Under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
Consumer Watchdog v. WARF: Consumer Rights Organization Lacks Standing to Appeal Inter Partes Reexam
4 Jun 2014, 8:10 pm
See generally 35 U.S.C. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 1:06 pm
In the letter, Senator Hatch also questions whether USPTO Director Michelle Lee was appointed consistent with 35 U.S.C. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 8:54 am
See generally 35 U.S.C. [read post]
