Search for: "Matter of Mark T."
Results 8921 - 8940
of 16,585
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Feb 2014, 3:58 pm
Seated, from left: Philip Miscimarra (R), Chairman Mark Gaston Pearce (D), and Kent Hirozawa (D). [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 1:12 pm
The Act presumes to extend itself quite broadly "This Act extends to acts, omissions, matters and things outside Australia (unless the contrary intention appears)." [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 10:13 am
The fact that Pernix was the one who directly conferred the benefit on defendants didn’t matter; benefits conferred through an intermediary can still amount to unjust enrichment. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 8:30 am
The fact of the matter is that some folks—like Mark Lassiter—are eager to create and use complex online tools. [read post]
12 Feb 2014, 4:02 am
Calling all trade mark scholars. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 8:27 pm
The reality is that no matter whether our athletes consider training for the Olympic a business or hobby, some portion – or all – of those training expenses would be deductible. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 8:09 am
Further, the high recognition factor of the Starbucks marks may make it easier for consumers to realise and understand the use as parody.However, Dumb Starbucks has reproduced Starbucks’ iconic marks in their entirety, in relation to identical goods, in the same product market, for example. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 4:40 am
Nonetheless, the PTO granted the application and published the BOBOV mark for opposition anyway. [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 2:54 pm
A Swiss Del Monte entity that had a license to use the “DEL MONTE” mark applies to operate the .delmonte generic top level domain (gTLD). [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 5:57 am
#SochiProblems http://t.co/gKnxCywKF0— Mark Connolly (@MarkConnollyCBC) February 06, 2014 This is the one hotel room @Sochi2014 have given us so far. [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 2:57 am
R (T & Anor) v SSHD & Anor, heard 9 – 10 December 2013. [read post]
9 Feb 2014, 9:37 pm
It would not matter that you started using your mark first and have superior trademark rights. [read post]
9 Feb 2014, 3:07 pm
He noted that "[i]t is not necessary for a Claimant under section 10(3) to produce evidence quantifying a change in economic behaviour. [read post]
9 Feb 2014, 2:27 pm
In the end, while the claim under Article 9(1)(a) of the CTM Regulation 2009 failed, the claim under Article 9(1)(b) succeeded as it didn’t matter that there was no confusion at the point of trade: what was decisive was that there was confusion pre-sale. [read post]
8 Feb 2014, 4:49 pm
Even if it doesn’t matter in end result, it matters in rhetoric. [read post]
8 Feb 2014, 12:18 pm
Eldredsolution doesn’t seem persuasive: patent at the Founders’ time was nothing like this.Printed matter: point of novelty can’t lie in printed matter, but that doesn’t really apply to the situation here (where the patent is on method of sending an advocacy message). [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 5:25 pm
It is very much a matter of judicial choice.]A: can check that.Eric Goldman: Could have spun finding as Ds win 50% of time. [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 2:29 pm
As a psychological matter, the fear is understandable. [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 2:26 am
These questions arose in connection with this Kat’s perusal of the recent decision of the EU General Court (Seventh Chamber) given on October 2, 2013, in The Cartoon Network, Inc. v OHIM and another (Case T-285/12),here, which inter alia addressed the issue of coexistence.As a matter of practice, and depending upon the jurisdiction, the thinking behind an inquiry into coexistence is that, if the two marks coexist in various jurisdictions, it should be an indication… [read post]
6 Feb 2014, 8:35 pm
The following Monday marked the installation of new Chief Justice Rita B. [read post]
