Search for: "State of California v. United States"
Results 8941 - 8960
of 13,836
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Aug 2012, 11:21 am
That is the question that will now be asked of juries as a result of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals’ recent opinion in United States v. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 11:11 am
Based on the United State Supreme Court's decision in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 1:46 am
In previous precedent, Bell v. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 2:30 pm
For example, in Pacific Merchant Shipping Association v. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 12:37 pm
Supreme Court Asked to Hear Proposition 8 Case Plaintiffs’ Attorneys: We are ready to defend our victories before the Supreme Court Washington, DC – Today, the proponents of California’s Proposition 8 asked the United States Supreme Court to review the landmark federal appeals court ruling in Perry v. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 9:42 am
by Clark Taylor In Citizens United v. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 7:20 am
A release of FLSA claims has often been seen to require approval either by the United States Department of Labor or a court. [read post]
28 Jul 2012, 2:34 pm
United States v. [read post]
28 Jul 2012, 2:34 pm
United States v. [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 12:53 pm
In Bridgeford, the court adopted the United States Supreme Court’s holding in Smith v. [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 10:03 am
United States. [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 9:30 am
Last year the United States Supreme Court held in Pliva, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 12:30 am
Servs. v. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 12:54 pm
State law regulates the enforceability of post-employment restrictive covenants, and some states (notably California) severely limit the enforceability of noncompete and non-solicitation agreements. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 7:35 am
United States v. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 5:00 am
Pacific Health Corp., 202 Cal.App.4th 1034 (2012)] and its adoption as a matter of California law of the United States Supreme Court’s analysis in Smith v. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 5:56 pm
The case is Scott v. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 5:56 pm
The case is Scott v. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 5:49 pm
[link] Interview of Rahm Emanuel by Julia Saenz (Univision), July 2011 The proposed ordinance is the latest in a slew of initiatives designed — as Emanuel has repeatedly put it since taking office — to make Chicago the “most immigrant-friendly city” not just in the United States, but “in the world. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 2:50 pm
" But in that case (which involved the sale of "mounted animal specimens," which was illegal in the taxpayers' home state of California) the Tax Court specifically found that, despite California law, "there is a market throughout the United States for items comparable to those donated by the [taxpayers]. [read post]
