Search for: "State v. Light"
Results 8961 - 8980
of 28,973
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jan 2018, 7:56 am
If you had a sense of déjà vu when you saw Encino Motorcars v. [read post]
10 Jan 2018, 3:00 am
Cowan v. [read post]
9 Jan 2018, 11:01 pm
Broadcom Corp, the Federal Circuit held that applications of the one-year time bar for inter partes review are, indeed, subject to judicial review in light of the Supreme Court’s 2016 decision in Cuozzo Speed Techs. v. [read post]
9 Jan 2018, 6:11 pm
New Mexico and Colorado v. [read post]
9 Jan 2018, 4:43 pm
In the recent case of United States District Court v. [read post]
9 Jan 2018, 12:42 pm
However, in the case of Jacobs v. [read post]
9 Jan 2018, 7:49 am
Here is how Justice Sandra Day O’Connor’s plurality opinion explained the point: In light of these principles, it is of no moment that the AUMF does not use specific language of detention. [read post]
9 Jan 2018, 1:12 am
The matter finally landed on the CJEU's desk, which rendered their decision in late December.As a short recap, the case of Schweppes SA v Red Paralela SL dealt with the sale of Schweppes' tonic water, for which the company owned several trademarks in many jurisdictions. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 7:11 pm
The appropriate scope of this bar has now been reconsidered by the Federal Circuit in light of the Supreme Court’s decision in Cuozzo Speed Technologies , LLC v. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 2:33 pm
The law also includes a non-exhaustive list of possible accommodations, including providing pregnant workers (i) more frequent or longer paid or unpaid breaks; (ii) time off to recover from childbirth with or without pay; (iii) acquisition or modification of equipment or seating; (iv) temporary transfer to a less strenuous or hazardous position; (v) job restructuring; (vi) light duty; (vii) private non-bathroom space for expressing breast milk; (viii) assistance with manual labor;… [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 2:33 pm
The law also includes a non-exhaustive list of possible accommodations, including providing pregnant workers (i) more frequent or longer paid or unpaid breaks; (ii) time off to recover from childbirth with or without pay; (iii) acquisition or modification of equipment or seating; (iv) temporary transfer to a less strenuous or hazardous position; (v) job restructuring; (vi) light duty; (vii) private non-bathroom space for expressing breast milk; (viii) assistance with manual labor;… [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 8:53 am
The trial court denied the petition,3 and in a non-precedential opinion [sic], the Ninth Circuit affirmed the denial of coram nobis.4 United States v. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 6:11 am
The Maryland legislature never enacted a “director consent” statute which is necessary to provide prospective directors notice sufficient enough to satisfy the Due Process Clause in light of the Supreme Court’s ruling in Shaffer v. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 3:56 am
Tao Licensing, LLC v. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 3:29 am
Court Declines Interim Mandatory Injunction Sought by Expelled LLC Member Ho v Yen, 2017 NY Slip Op 32732(U) [Sup Ct Queens County Nov. 13, 2017]. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 2:26 am
The case, City of Hays, Kansas v. [read post]
7 Jan 2018, 8:15 pm
Bernstein et al., v. [read post]
7 Jan 2018, 4:05 pm
India Criticism of the Indian government’s Aadhaar Project in light of the Supreme Court case Puttaswamy v Union of India is growing, as noted by The Wire. [read post]
5 Jan 2018, 11:49 am
P’ship v. [read post]
5 Jan 2018, 11:49 am
P’ship v. [read post]
