Search for: "In Re: David Smith"
Results 881 - 900
of 1,596
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Apr 2015, 7:31 am
Darren provide further food for thoughts on the recent couple of Board of Appeal decisions G2/12 Tomatoes II and G3/12 Broccoli II, which related to an exception to patentability and which David reported on this weblog a few days ago.* BREAKING NEWS: It's official -- the law is an ASOS, or is it an ASSOS ...? [read post]
11 Oct 2014, 9:45 am
(Calling it secondary meaning already obscures what’s going on—it’s a disavowal of what we’re saying, which is that some symbol is functioning the way we ordinarily expect a mark to function, but we’re still not going to protect it for competitive reasons.)Grinvald: David Barnes makes a similar argument from a marketing perspective. [read post]
9 Mar 2021, 9:39 am
Roger Smith sums up the concept as follows: Legal design is a distinctive approach with the following attributes: 1. [read post]
28 Apr 2013, 6:07 am
Re-create the memory. [read post]
6 Jul 2014, 12:30 am
David Garrow reviews the book for The Washington Post, and Salon has an excerpt, "When SCOTUS still fixed things: What American looked like before the Warren Court. [read post]
5 Aug 2015, 1:00 pm
See In re Andrews, 52 P.3d 656 (Cal. 2002). [read post]
29 Nov 2015, 11:18 am
David Cambria opens the survey with a nice introduction. [read post]
12 Mar 2023, 9:54 am
" "You're not welcome here, we hate you! [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 9:00 am
We're going to the bathroom.' Within 8 meters, they disappeared. [read post]
1 May 2020, 3:00 am
Start-Ups Pursue ‘Free Money’ with Relief Funds, Prompting Backlash MSN – Erin Griffith and David McCabe (New York Times) | Published: 4/27/2020 Scrutiny of the Paycheck Protection Program, the $349 billion plan to save jobs at small businesses during the coronavirus outbreak, has reached technology start-ups. [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 2:57 pm
In re Lehman Brothers Securities & ERISA Litigation, 655 F. [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 5:00 am
By: David A. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 2:14 pm
We’re dragging them through the mud. [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 9:24 am
The reason they’re there is to ensure the integrity of the drugs. [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 5:31 pm
(See here for analysis by David Kaye defending the no-new-search position and this Note defending the opposite view.) [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 9:01 pm
’” For anyone interested, I have included a few other leading reviews that I found interesting: Daily Kos (by Susan Gardner), New York Times (by David Shribman), New York Times Book Review (by Christopher Buckley, whom everyone should know), Pittsburgh Post-Gazette (by Dan Simpson ), Politico (by Ben Smith), Salon (by Alex Pareene), Slate (by David Weigel) and Washington Post (by Carlos Lozada). [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 7:02 am
By: David A. [read post]
15 Jan 2023, 1:28 am
David Torrance, House of Commons Library: The Crown and the constitution. [read post]
7 May 2013, 5:59 am
Here Sanders asserts what Martyn Smith opined, and ignores the data that contradicted Smith. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 6:41 am
By: David A. [read post]
