Search for: "Louisiana v. Texas"
Results 881 - 900
of 1,589
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Apr 2015, 9:06 am
District Court for the Northern District of Texas ordered a preliminary injunction in Texas v. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 8:10 am
District Court for the Northern District of Texas ordered a preliminary injunction in Texas v. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 5:20 am
District Court for the Northern District of Texas ordered a preliminary injunction in Texas v. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 5:20 am
District Court for the Northern District of Texas ordered a preliminary injunction in Texas v. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 4:52 am
District Court for the Northern District of Texas ordered a preliminary injunction in Texas v. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 9:28 pm
., L.L.C. v. [read post]
5 Apr 2015, 3:00 am
The case is ConocoPhillips Company v. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 9:47 am
See order in Texas v. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 9:29 am
., et al. v. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 4:50 am
What do employers need to know about the Supreme Court’s pregnancy accommodation decision last week in Young v. [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 12:11 pm
According to the court’s ruling, the public has an “abiding interest” in protecting state laws from “federal encroachment” (Texas v. [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 7:51 am
Cain, a capital case from Louisiana. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 8:24 am
The Louisiana Supreme Court has fully analyzed this article for a land-based Louisiana tort, see Arabie v. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 7:15 am
The state of Texas filed the instant action against the federal government and the DOL; it was later joined in the action by the states of Arkansas, Louisiana, and Nebraska. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 1:40 pm
Texas, Louisiana, Arkansas and Nebraska filed suit in federal court seeking to block this revised rule, arguing that compliance with the federal rule results in violation of the state’s prohibition on recognition of same-sex marriages. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 1:10 pm
The rule was to take effect on March 27, but a federal district judge in Texas issued a temporary injunction on March 26 in response to a challenge from the attorneys general in Texas, Arkansas, Louisiana, and Nebraska. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 10:38 am
Yesterday, however, a group of Attorney Generals from Texas, Nebraska, Arkansas, and Louisiana obtained a preliminary injunction that will delay the rule’s implementation until the court considers the full merits of this case. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 9:55 am
Louisiana, 14-6673, and the indefinitely rescheduled Davis v. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 3:37 am
” The plaintiffs were the states of Texas, Louisiana, Arkansas, and Nebraska. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 6:05 am
A number of those actions were consolidated and transferred to the Eastern District of Louisiana. [read post]
