Search for: "State v. B. W."
Results 881 - 900
of 4,254
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Sep 2018, 5:32 pm
Wright & Kenneth W. [read post]
21 Oct 2007, 11:00 pm
Lupu & Robert W. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 4:00 am
Haywood v. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 9:24 am
W. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 12:07 pm
In the 9thCircuit, the IP exemption means federal IP; other circuits, and even California state law, include state based IP claims.Dogan: Need to argue on two levels: if yo [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 4:00 am
Accruing vacation and sick leave credits during leave for ordered military leaveAndrews v State of New York, 2016 NY Slip Op 02895, Appellate Division, Third DepartmentAn employee of the State as the employer absent from his or her position while on “ordered military duty,” is placed on military leave* from his or her position in accordance with provisions in the State Military Law and the Rules of the State Civil Service Commission. [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 9:07 am
See Kirk v. [read post]
11 May 2007, 6:10 am
KSR v. [read post]
20 Nov 2017, 1:00 am
R (B) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 14-15 Nov 2017. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 9:13 pm
Each post in this Year in Review series features a different federal courthouse in each state of the Union. [read post]
16 Feb 2018, 12:00 pm
Ct doesn’t directly address license v. sale b/c they say it’s a sale. [read post]
3 May 2016, 2:30 pm
Hopefully BMG v. [read post]
13 Mar 2017, 2:00 am
R (A) (a Child) (by her litigation friend B) v Secretary of State for Health, heard 2 November 2016. [read post]
21 Aug 2020, 12:30 pm
Ramsey: does the corpus distinguish b/t contexts where brand use is more likely (casual discussions) v. where it’s not (academic journal articles)? [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 1:00 am
R (A) (a Child) (by her litigation friend B) v Secretary of State for Health, heard 2 November 2016. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 9:01 am
W. [read post]
28 Oct 2022, 10:07 am
The NetherlandsVan Haga v. [read post]
30 Mar 2014, 7:14 am
United States v. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 1:00 am
R (Hallam) v Secretary of State for Justice; R (Nealon) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 8-9 May 2018. [read post]
11 Aug 2017, 8:08 am
Procedural: qui tam structure (addressing fraud on the public, misuse of a state grant). [read post]
