Search for: "State v. CERTIFIED SERVICES, INC."
Results 881 - 900
of 1,644
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Oct 2014, 11:47 am
Segovia v. [read post]
3 Oct 2014, 8:25 am
Luke's Hospital under his Services Agreement and not an employee.EEOC v. [read post]
1 Oct 2014, 8:53 am
Co. v. [read post]
25 Sep 2014, 7:26 am
Three years ago, the Supreme Court found in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 6:00 am
Mireles v. [read post]
23 Sep 2014, 8:04 am
Sure-Tan, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Sep 2014, 1:06 pm
Beyond these two strands, we were introduced to the great modern structures of law making in the United States. [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 6:40 am
However, certification was denied as to a class for the employee’s wage statement claims (Ridgeway v Wal-Mart Stores Inc dba Wal-Mart Transportation LLC, September 10, 2014, Illston, S). [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 11:00 am
Amending a petition after a 101.106 motion is filed TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF AGING AND DISABILITY SERVICES A/K/A BRENHAM STATE SCHOOL, ANTHONY V. [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 8:00 am
Borello & Sons, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 12:24 pm
Many of the court’s reasons sprang from the Supreme Court’s opinion in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 6:36 am
The court, in Lagos v Cogent Communications, Inc., conditionally certified a nationwide collective action consisting of current and former global account managers (GAMS) and regional account managers (RAMS) employed by Cogent during a specified time period who worked over 40 hours in a work week. [read post]
29 Aug 2014, 9:16 am
Implications For Employers This case is a reminder that cases seeking to certify a class of individuals affected by a common policy, such as BFOQs, are difficult to attack using a framework underWal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 12:51 pm
(See also Miller v. [read post]
20 Aug 2014, 12:50 pm
Schwan’s Home Service, Inc., the plaintiff filed a putative class action against Schwan’s Home Service, Inc., seeking, among other things, to certify a class of customer service managers for the claim that defendant failed to reimburse their work-related cell phone expenses pursuant to California Labor Code Section 2802. [read post]
11 Aug 2014, 4:53 am
In Lupyan v. [read post]
23 Jul 2014, 11:50 pm
Burwell, No. 13-1540, and Reaching Souls Int'l, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 10:40 am
Directors of Covered Entities should be contacted by the relevant registered office service provider for their Covered Entity, however, if you have not been contacted and you serve as a director for a CIMA registered fund you should contact your registered office provider or counsel. [read post]
16 Jul 2014, 1:19 pm
On June 27, in In re Kellogg Brown & Root, Inc.,1 the United States Court of Appeals for the D.C. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 4:15 am
In Center For Inquiry, Inc. v. [read post]
