Search for: "State v. Gamble" Results 881 - 900 of 1,692
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Feb 2010, 11:47 am
Perjury while testifying during a §3020-a disciplinary hearing results in court vacating the underlying arbitration awardPhelps-Clifton Springs CSD v Nicot, Supreme Court, Ontario County, Index #103465, Justice Frederick G. [read post]
6 Oct 2017, 4:00 pm by Amy Howe
United States Monday, December 4 Christie v. [read post]
23 Oct 2007, 3:27 pm
” Fitch’s application for a stay is docketed as 07A324, Fitch v. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 9:47 am by Eugene Volokh
Judge Porteous also engaged in corrupt conduct after the Lifemark v. [read post]
27 Dec 2006, 6:17 pm
The Chicago-based association, which has more than 300 members, last year issued a code of ethics stating that marketers should disclose ties to sponsors. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 12:36 pm by Michelle Yeary
            We first happened upon Loreto v. [read post]
29 Oct 2019, 12:47 pm by Ilya Somin
Instead of directly ordering states to ban sports gambling, PASPA forbids states from repealing a prohibition of it in ways that "authorize" the activity under state law. [read post]
12 Jul 2022, 6:32 am by John Jascob
The fact that Sinclair understood "reasonable best efforts" differently than Tribune and then failed in its gamble to keep the stations was fraud by hindsight, the court said, and the investors could have been winners if Sinclair's gambit had succeeded (Water Island Event-Driven Fund, LLC v. [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 11:55 am by Hanni Fakhoury
The state recently used consumer protection laws to secure a $1 million settlement from a gambling website that turned its users' computers into a botnet to mine for Bitcoins without the users' knowledge. [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 5:00 am by Bexis
Superior Court, 920 P.2d 1347, 1352-53 (Cal. 1996); Washington State Physicians Insurance Exchange & Ass’n v. [read post]
7 Nov 2015, 5:47 am by Elina Saxena
" David Ryan shed light on the Ninth Circuit's en banc decision in the United States v. [read post]