Search for: "State v. Levy"
Results 881 - 900
of 2,131
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jun 2023, 1:11 pm
In Lindke v. [read post]
28 Feb 2013, 10:16 am
The First Circuit Court of Appeals on February 27, 2013 decided in favor of the Museum of Fine Arts, Boston (MFA) and Harvard’s museums in the case of Rubin v. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 1:57 pm
In today’s case (Norris v. [read post]
20 Dec 2007, 3:59 am
Kerson Co. v Shayne, Dachs, Weiss, Kolbrenner, Levy & Levine, 45 NY2d 730), is merely a recognition of the factual particularities of proving proximate cause and damages in such an action. [read post]
13 Apr 2022, 7:43 am
Wash.) in United Federation of Churches, LLC d/b/a The Satanic Temple v. [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 9:37 am
In the recent real estate case, Roman Catholic Bishop of Fall River v. [read post]
22 Jan 2020, 6:00 am
Why Levy Excise Taxes? [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 3:35 pm
Levy, below. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 8:00 pm
State Farm Fire and Casualty Co. v. [read post]
3 May 2019, 7:21 am
Levi Distinguished Service Professor at the University of Chicago. [read post]
11 Aug 2015, 10:17 am
EDISON, Inc., v. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 10:06 pm
Abood v. [read post]
23 Dec 2008, 9:02 am
Hatto; Hatto v. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 5:06 am
In Marek v. [read post]
16 May 2019, 12:15 pm
In APPLE INC. v. [read post]
28 Jul 2021, 8:49 am
Condition C states that, as a requirement for issuing a follower notice, HMRC must be “of the opinion that there is a judicial ruling which is relevant to the chosen arrangements”. [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 4:59 am
His decision on circuit in United States v. [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 1:40 pm
[Full disclosure: Horvitz & Levy LLP represents the petitioner, the Board of Trustees of the California State University, in this matter.] [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 4:16 pm
Consequently, the copyright holders might very well end up empty handed, especially as the State Secretary at the same time wants to abolish the Dutch private copy levy system. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 10:15 pm
"* Sections 17 and 18 of the Public Officers Law, respectively, requires that the appropriate employer provide for the defense and indemnification of State and municipal officers and employees being sued for acts or omissions involving the performance of their official duties.The decision is posted on the Internet at:[www.courts.state.ny.us] [read post]
