Search for: "U.S. v. Under Seal" Results 881 - 900 of 1,420
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Nov 2013, 2:35 am by Jonathan Hummel
The consumer groups have appealed the sealing and pseudonymity rulings to the U.S. [read post]
20 Oct 2013, 8:45 pm by Ken White
Chowdhury and his attorneys, not ones to pass up the opportunity to club a baby seal, asked the court to enter a default against Prenda, citing Prenda's failure to post the ordered bond and its failure to answer the counterclaim, as well as the emerging evidence of Prenda's misconduct and deceit. [read post]
19 Oct 2013, 8:53 pm by Schachtman
  Under the Federal Rules of Evidence, and most state evidentiary law, Schepers’ prior statements are admissible as they bear on his credibility and the truth of his later, scurrilous writings: “When a hearsay statement … has been admitted in evidence, the declarant’s credibility may be attacked, and then supported, by any evidence that would be admissible for those purposes if the declarant had testified as a witness. [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 12:44 pm by The Book Review Editor
 The Iran hostage crisis, Iranian support for terrorist groups abroad, and many other factors contributed to a distinct American view that, however bad Saddam might be, in geopolitical terms, Iran under Ayatollah Khomeini was a far greater threat to the United States and its allies. [read post]
13 Sep 2013, 7:17 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Even under our “expansive and flexible” obviousnessanalysis (see KSR Int’l Co. v. [read post]
10 Sep 2013, 6:03 am by Bruce E. Boyden
(As a U.S. government agency, the NSA has no copyright in its logo either, under 17 U.S.C. [read post]
24 Aug 2013, 2:52 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
” Nixon, 435 U.S. at 598. (...)see also Apple Inc. v. [read post]