Search for: "United States v. Little" Results 881 - 900 of 12,051
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Dec 2007, 4:30 pm
“Chutzpah” is about the most polite word I could come up with for the appellant’s audacity in United States v. [read post]
14 Jul 2024, 7:24 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
United States will remain the subject of intense debate and disagreement for decades to come. [read post]
25 Oct 2013, 12:46 pm by National Indian Law Library
Village of Hobart, Wisconsin (Clean Water Act, storm water)* United States Federal Trial Courts Bulletin http://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/dct/currentdct.htmCases featured: Trazell v. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 7:37 am
I previously posted here about a case in front of the United States Supreme Court that deals with how far does the rule from Georgia v. [read post]
31 Mar 2023, 8:55 am by Lawrence Solum
  Here is the abstract: This term, the Supreme Court is considering the independent state legislature theory in Moore v. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 9:57 am by Hunton & Williams LLP
On March 1, 2011, the United States Supreme Court issued a unanimous ruling in Federal Communications Commission v. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 4:56 pm
Kudos to TalkLeft contributer Last Night in Little Rock (aka John Wesley Hall of Little Rock, AR) for filing a motion challenging Alberto Gonzales' firing of U.S. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 8:46 pm by Howard Friedman
Davenport, 637 F.3d 1095 (2010) he wrote a dissent from the denial of an en banc rehearing in a case which held that memorial crosses donated by the Utah Highway Patrol Association and placed on public property to commemorate fallen troopers violate the Establishment Clause.⇾ In United States v. [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 3:45 am
Thank you to "an anonymous friend" for bringing this case to my attention.In the context of a restitution motion, in United States of America v. [read post]
4 Oct 2012, 8:06 am by Medicare Set Aside Services
In an order issued on October 1, 2012, the Supreme Court of the United States denied certiorari in Hadden v. [read post]