Search for: "Wells v. Department of Health and Human Services"
Results 881 - 900
of 1,298
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jan 2014, 12:00 pm
Department of Health and Human Services; Jacob Lew, in his capacity as Secretary of the U.S. [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 4:28 pm
v=j0pl_FXt0eMWilliam F. [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 4:28 pm
v=j0pl_FXt0eMWilliam F. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 5:29 pm
Labor Department files suit to restore losses to the Miller’s Health Systems Employee Stock Ownership Plan Bank or other plan trustees and fiduciaries of Employee Stock Ownership Plans or other employee benefit plans holding company stock, sponsoring employers and their management should heed the new Perez v. [read post]
13 Dec 2013, 6:29 am
In Nelson v. [read post]
13 Dec 2013, 2:36 am
The ACA made a significant addition to this list: Congress decided that virtually all Americans should be entitled to a wide array of affordable “preventive health services. [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 7:28 pm
”From the face of those complaints, and the plaintiffs’ briefs, it sure sounds as if the “Preventive Services” Rule issued by the Department of Health and Human Services (together with the Departments of Labor and Treasury) will, indeed, “substantially burden” the plaintiffs’ religious exercise: Plaintiffs allege that that Rule (together with other federal statutes) will require them to violate… [read post]
10 Dec 2013, 9:25 am
Department of Health & Human Service’s Office of Civil Rights required a doctor to stop using Medical Justice’s anti-review form. [read post]
8 Dec 2013, 9:00 pm
Lastly, the Department of Health and Human Services is going to be publishing rules implementing the Affordable Care Act’s non-discrimination provisions, which provide protections against discrimination in health programs and by activities of covered entities. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 7:38 pm
In Gilardi v Department of Health and Human Services, a divided D.C. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 4:09 pm
That issue has come up in the two cases the Justices have agreed to hear presenting challenges to the “contraceptive insurance” Rule of the Department of Health and Human Services under Affordable Care Act: No. 13-354, Sebelius v. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 12:20 pm
In early October, I wrote about a rule that the Department of Health and Human Services has proposed that would amend the National Organ Transplant Act (NOTA) to criminalize compensation for providing peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs) given through apheresis. [read post]
1 Nov 2013, 9:21 am
Department of Health & Human Services, Circuit docket 13-5069) involves two brothers — Francis and Philip Gilardi — who are the sole owners of Freshway Foods and Freshway Logistics, fresh-food processing companies based in Sidney, Ohio. [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 2:08 pm
Sebelius, et al., Case No. 12-2673 (6th Cir.), which dismissed claims brought by several plaintiffs challenging the so-called contraception and abortion mandate by the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) that went into effect last year under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, Public Law 111-148. [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 2:08 pm
Sebelius, et al., Case No. 12-2673 (6th Cir.), which dismissed claims brought by several plaintiffs challenging the so-called contraception and abortion mandate by the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) that went into effect last year under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, Public Law 111-148. [read post]
19 Oct 2013, 8:53 pm
Schepers memorialized his contemporaneous observations, which frequently contradicted him when he was confronted by well-prepared defense counsel, in court or deposition examination. [read post]
13 Oct 2013, 3:36 pm
In Arkansas Department of Health & Human Services v. [read post]
10 Oct 2013, 8:28 am
However, the hospital where McLean performed the stent procedures separately entered into a settlement with the government in which it agreed to pay $2.8 million, and was subjected to oversight by the Department of Health and Human Services under a so-called “Corporate Integrity Agreement. [read post]
29 Sep 2013, 10:03 am
Germany, Liberty and Others v. the United Kingdom and Kennedy v. the United Kingdom. [read post]
18 Sep 2013, 8:04 pm
The need for inter-agency coordination with the IRS and Department of Health and Human Services (which have already adopted place-of-celebration rules) also led to adoption of the place-of-celebration rule. [read post]
