Search for: "MATTER OF P S" Results 8981 - 9000 of 18,870
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jun 2014, 8:39 am by Steve Erickson
   He is under no hallucination regarding his opponent's size, but his belief about the danger posed to him is faulty no matter how firm his resolve regarding it may be. [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 12:14 pm
Cox Retirement Properties, Inc., 302 P.3d 789 (Okla. 2013). [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 6:36 am
The new Prime Minister’s website also highlights transparency and accountability as the foundation of the NDA’s preferred method for governance for the next five years. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 9:01 pm by KC Johnson
”Cohan eliminated a paragraph (p. 272) containing Reade Seligmann’s reaction to learning from Kirk Osborn that Nifong wouldn’t drop the case. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 4:36 am by Kevin LaCroix
A detailed appendix to the memo examines the 32 S&P 500 corporations that have adopted exclusive forum bylaws. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 4:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
  What's more, the high court depublished three appellate cases that favored the defense in early 2013. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 3:06 am
The SC held that the Administrator of a UT is never bound by the advice of his CoM, and that in the event of a disagreement between the Administrator and his CoM on any matter, the Administrator is required to refer the matter to the President for his decision [p.7]. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 5:08 pm
Here’s a sample of the Hoven reasoning on the matter (though the court goes into considerably more detail): [T]he Self–Defense Act does not confer a right on the public to engage in self-defense. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 2:33 pm by Law Lady
SUASTI, Appellee. 3rd District.Contempt -- Error to find party in contempt for failing to produce documents where underlying order that served as basis for contempt finding merely denied a motion for a protective order and stated that certain information should be redacted from discovery, but did not expressly require production of documentsOASIS BUILDERS, LLC, a Florida limited liability company, and RICK P. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 2:26 pm by Arthur F. Coon
”  Rather, it held as a matter of law that the project fell within the coverage of the exemption’s second clause – “installation of small new equipment and facilities in small structures” – and rejected plaintiffs’ argument that the clause was limited to existing small structures as contrary to the exemption’s plain language. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 5:21 am
Roden, 279 P.3d (Washington Court of Appeals 2012). [read post]
1 Jun 2014, 7:45 am by Schachtman
We do not think anything is amiss with special courts for tax, patent, family law, national security, equity, or commercial matters. [read post]
29 May 2014, 1:38 pm
 Case 2: At the outset, we note that plaintiffs' factual summary in their opening brief is substantially one-sided and argumentative, in violation of California Rules of Court rule 8.204(a)(2)(C) that a brief must "[p]rovide a summary of the significant facts limited to matters in the record. [read post]
29 May 2014, 12:43 pm by Paralegal Student
On the plus side, Boutilier notes: “Therrien is the Justice Department’s point man on matters of national defense, public safety and immigration law. [read post]
29 May 2014, 12:43 pm by Paralegal Student
On the plus side, Boutilier notes: “Therrien is the Justice Department’s point man on matters of national defense, public safety and immigration law. [read post]
29 May 2014, 10:50 am by Guest Blogger
Despite the Constitution’s silence on such matters, Madison was willing to endorse the measure. [read post]