Search for: "State v. Save" Results 9001 - 9020 of 11,766
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Feb 2011, 4:42 am by Steve McConnell
There's nothing clear about that holding save for hostility to off-label use. [read post]
6 Feb 2011, 10:16 pm by Richard Frank
Estimated savings: $3 billion per year. [read post]
6 Feb 2011, 2:53 pm by David Doniger
  Because of EPA and California, the first round standards are delivering 47 percent more carbon reductions and 33 percent more fuel savings than CAFE standards alone, and saving consumers nearly $60 billion dollars more than CAFE standards alone. [read post]
5 Feb 2011, 10:22 am by Steve Bainbridge
Default rules in this sense provide cost savings comparable to those provided by standard form contracts, because both can be accepted without the need for costly negotiation. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 7:42 pm
Readers of this blog may recall my criticism of the Ninth Circuit's decision in Pintos v. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 12:10 pm by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
The President's action authorizes the Department of Homeland Security, Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), to coordinate all disaster relief efforts which have the purpose of alleviating the hardship and suffering caused by the emergency on the local population, and to provide appropriate assistance for required emergency measures, authorized under Title V of the Stafford Act, to save lives and to protect property and public health and safety, and to lessen or avert… [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 2:11 pm by Bexis
Some states require a physical impact or physical contact; and others do not recognize the cause of action at all.Blain v. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 9:26 am by PJ Blount
Stating the reasons why protection is necessary. [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 6:30 pm by Schachtman
  The landmark case of Borel v. [read post]