Search for: "LARGE v. LARGE"
Results 9081 - 9100
of 40,643
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Feb 2020, 8:49 am
Falk Pharma GMBH v. [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 7:47 am
” Yesterday, in a reported (precedent setting) opinion in the case of S.W. v. [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 6:28 am
These two cases are the thin edge of a large wedge. [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 4:00 am
"The Appellate Division then noted that the Court of Appeals in its decision in Palmer v Merges, 37 NY2d 177, observed that the rule authorizing a second probationary term, "if properly executed, is largely beneficial to the employee" and "[i]n determining whether another probationary term is necessary as the only alternative to dismissal, the administrator should be given latitude in defining a different assignment' for purposes of fresh evaluation. [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 4:00 am
"The Appellate Division then noted that the Court of Appeals in its decision in Palmer v Merges, 37 NY2d 177, observed that the rule authorizing a second probationary term, "if properly executed, is largely beneficial to the employee" and "[i]n determining whether another probationary term is necessary as the only alternative to dismissal, the administrator should be given latitude in defining a different assignment' for purposes of fresh evaluation. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 8:09 pm
This was the issue for phone book directories created by automation processes in the case of Telstra Corp v Phone Directories, as well as datasheets created by the operation of computer programs in Acohs Pty Ltd v Ucorp Pty Ltd. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 8:09 pm
This was the issue for phone book directories created by automation processes in the case of Telstra Corp v Phone Directories, as well as datasheets created by the operation of computer programs in Acohs Pty Ltd v Ucorp Pty Ltd. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 3:16 pm
In Joiner v. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 10:03 am
This post unpacks briefings from the defense, the government and Google (through an amicus brief) on the motion to suppress in that case, U.S. v. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 10:02 am
Hassel v. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 10:01 am
Murder case on Tinder, which was v. helpful. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 9:08 am
Toys R Us, Inc. and Taylor v. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 7:01 am
United States v. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 6:38 am
The Court (Lynch, Lohier and Sullivan) said that Gonzalez v. [read post]
23 Feb 2020, 9:54 am
Critics of the National Association of Scholars’ conference on Fixing Science pointed readers to an article in Undark, an on-line popular science site for lay audiences, and they touted the site for its science journalism. [read post]
23 Feb 2020, 8:57 am
But then there was Earle v Charalambous (2006) EWCA Civ 1090. [read post]
23 Feb 2020, 8:57 am
But then there was Earle v Charalambous (2006) EWCA Civ 1090. [read post]
22 Feb 2020, 4:12 am
See Codispoti v. [read post]
21 Feb 2020, 4:53 pm
These came from large tech businesses, SMEs, academics, think tanks, children’s charities, rights groups, publishers, governmental organisations and individuals. [read post]
