Search for: "Does 1-10" Results 9141 - 9160 of 41,681
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jun 2020, 4:41 am by Russell Knight
  What exactly does “Best Interest Of The Child” mean in an Illinois divorce or custody case? [read post]
1 Jan 2012, 5:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
Here the following applies: procedural acts that were legally effective for the proceedings (verfahrensgestaltend schon rechtswirksam) and completed (e.g. the time limit for filing an opposition (TFO)) before the entry into force of the EPC 2000 on December 13, 2007, are to be decided on the basis of the old law (J 10/07 [1]; T 1172/04 [1], tempus regit actum). [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 5:03 am by Simon Lester
In this regard, paragraph 1 of the aforementioned Article 25.1 says that the GATT Article XX exceptions apply to the digital trade chapter (along with other chapters): 1. [read post]
23 May 2021, 4:01 am by Administrator
The limitation in s. 37(10) constitutes a prima facie breach of s. 15 that cannot be justified under s. 1. [read post]
16 Jun 2009, 5:40 am
It's the 8 or 10 bits, read together, that actually give the position. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 12:48 am by Michael Geist
On the other hand, CASL’s penalties are significant with the maximum penalty set at $1 million per violation for an individual and $10 million per violation for a business (despite fears of massive penalties for a single slip-up, warnings are far more likely than penalties). [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 7:52 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
A figure from the prior artutilized in Dow’s brief illustrates a typical stress/straincurve. (...)NOVA argues that the term “slope of strain hardeningcoefficient,” ’053 patent col. 16 l. 19, is indefinite becausethe patent fails to teach with reasonable certainty whereand how the “slope of strain hardening” should be measured.8Although the patents state that “FIG. 1 shows thevarious stages of the stress/strain curve used to calculatethe slope of… [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 11:44 am by 1p21.admin
  Respondents rated each question on a scale of 1 to 10, with 10 being the highest level of concern. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 11:44 am by 1p21.admin
  Respondents rated each question on a scale of 1 to 10, with 10 being the highest level of concern. [read post]
22 Dec 2011, 11:21 am by .
Oakes, 1986 CanLII 46 (SCC), [1986] 1 SCR 103 R. v. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 1:39 pm by WIMS
Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit, Case No. 10-60411, consolidated with Case Numbers 10-60413, 10-60414, 10-60415, 10-60416. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 11:44 am by 1p21.admin
  Respondents rated each question on a scale of 1 to 10, with 10 being the highest level of concern. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 9:28 am by Evan M. Levow
The refusal statute imposes increasing penalties for (1) first, (2) second, and (3) third or subsequent offenses. [read post]
14 Oct 2016, 12:12 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  SDNY issued a decision that purports not to disagree w/Perfect 10 but really does; cites a lot to the dissent. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 1:14 pm by WIMS
 Access the 48-page detail of the DOE budget proposals (click here). [read post]