Search for: "State v. Light"
Results 9161 - 9180
of 26,003
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jan 2015, 7:22 am
The So-Called 10% Rule2) A Response Regarding the 10% Rule3) Situating the Opposition--The Hypocrisy of Misrepresentative GovernmentOn 14th January this year, the Delhi High Court in the case of Imran Ali v Union of India delivered its judgment in the light of a PIL seeking the appointment of an LoP. [read post]
13 Jun 2023, 8:32 pm
United Kingdom Judgment in Light of the Euratom Treaty’s Drafting History ESIL Corner Seline Trevisanut, Machiko Kanetake & Cedric Ryngaert, The In/ Ex-clusiveness of International Law: Some Remarks on the 17th Annual Conference of the European Society of International Law by the Local Organizers E. [read post]
7 Mar 2014, 7:53 am
The Third Circuit held, first, that the District Court applied the proper standard to determine whether to conduct an in camera examination, based on the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 4:35 am
Copyrights Meet Politics: Joe Walsh (Rockstar) v. [read post]
11 May 2023, 7:01 pm
In the case of Estate of Patterson v. [read post]
10 Sep 2015, 8:25 am
Under United States v. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 6:14 am
We see how that all works out in a recent Second Circuit decision that upholds a New York City gun regulation against a Second Amendment challenge.The case is New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
16 May 2016, 9:35 am
In a per curiam opinion in Zubik v. [read post]
6 Sep 2018, 2:12 am
Before I'll get to discuss the strategically extremely important exhaustion issue (in light of the Supreme Court's 2017 Lexmark) in Apple v. [read post]
27 Jan 2025, 5:00 am
In the case of Johnson v. [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 3:13 am
(NB: At the end of 2016, in Argus Leader Media v. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 4:31 pm
The case is not final, pending the possibility of a motion for rehearing and the outcome of such a rehearing if it is granted, but interested persons should monitor its status.Assuming the Court’s opinion becomes final, it is difficult to know how counties with such mandatory requirements will react, both within and without the counties making up the Fourth DCA (such as whether they will remove such mandatory requirement, otherwise attempt to re-work their rules in light of the… [read post]
2 Jan 2013, 7:58 am
Including the Fourth Amendment.The case is United States v. [read post]
19 May 2014, 4:23 am
In 2006, for instance, Justice Anthony Kennedy stated as simple fact in eBay v. [read post]
11 Sep 2018, 10:00 pm
Until recently, the law had been settled that any sale (within the United States) of a product that included claimed features of an invention is prior art, even if the sale did not publicly disclose those claimed features. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 6:51 pm
In addition to requesting a remand under United States v. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 8:10 am
., a Minnesota Limited Liability Co. v. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 9:46 am
What: Hearing in ACLU of SoCal and EFF v. [read post]
27 May 2016, 8:18 am
The second September 30, 2013 order granted the motion for summary judgment by the State defendants. [read post]
6 May 2019, 9:30 pm
The Supreme Court most recently relied on that rationale in Oil States Energy Services v. [read post]
