Search for: "Does 1-96" Results 901 - 920 of 2,165
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Nov 2016, 4:00 am by Paula Bremner
Post-issuance, the provisions of subsection 53(1) must be utilized with respect to allegations of misrepresentation. [read post]
9 Nov 2016, 6:48 am
This post examines an opinion from the Oregon Supreme Court: State v. [read post]
4 Nov 2016, 1:51 pm by Jay
 These scammers spend as much time perfecting their craft as anyone else does working in a legitimate profession. [read post]
17 Oct 2016, 10:34 am by emagraken
 He is a stoic who does his best to get on with and complete the work assigned to him. [95]         I also take note of the fact that the plaintiff, while frequently turning down overtime, has worked 14 overtime shifts since August 1, 2015. [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 12:32 pm by Jamie Markham
” If the person is a prison inmate serving a pre–December 1, 2011 sentence that does not include post-release supervision, the prison system will issue that certificate. [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 12:32 pm by Jamie Markham
” If the person is a prison inmate serving a pre–December 1, 2011 sentence that does not include post-release supervision, the prison system will issue that certificate. [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 6:48 am
A waiver of Miranda rights signed by the defendant was admitted into evidence as People's Exhibit 1. [read post]
18 Sep 2016, 5:51 pm
If the presumption of advancement is specifically abolished regarding matters under Part 5 of the FLA, does section 96 of the FLA provide sufficient flexibility to allow a Court to address any alleged unfairness that results from the tracing of excluded property? [read post]
8 Sep 2016, 7:40 am
., Duke Energy Carolinas LLC, Duke Energy Progress LLC and Progress Energy Inc. from the Government Pension Fund Global (GPFG)  Confidential pursuant to section 13 subsection 1 of the Freedom of Information Act, cf section 3-4 subsection 1 of the Securities Trading Act.Summary The Council on Ethics for the Government Pension Fund Global recommends the exclusion of Duke Energy Corp. [read post]
6 Sep 2016, 11:23 am by Arthur F. Coon
  CHRP administratively appealed the County BZA’s project approval to the Board, which held 2 public hearings, revised the project’s proposed conditions of approval, denied the appeal, adopted the SMND, and approved the project subject to 96 conditions of approval. [read post]
12 Aug 2016, 11:12 am
 In contrast to regular opinions, a per curiam does not list the individual judge responsible for authoring the decision, but minority dissenting and concurring decisions are signed. [read post]