Search for: "FELTS v. STATE"
Results 901 - 920
of 5,847
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Dec 2016, 9:54 am
As it happens my law school is housed in a building named for John Lord O'Brian, a one-time United States Attorney most famous for prosecuting Eugene V. [read post]
25 Nov 2014, 4:10 am
In Hickenlooper v. [read post]
30 Jun 2021, 5:00 am
In the case of Janiszewski v. [read post]
18 Apr 2014, 9:11 am
Wang v. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 7:47 am
The case is State v. [read post]
21 Jul 2022, 8:20 am
Hacon HHJ was not convinced by JCB’s argument, stating (see [56]) that where the evidence otherwise suggests that a claimed invention was obvious at the priority date, an argument of long felt want can only negate that evidence if there is no plausible reason, other than that the invention was not obvious, for the invention having not been performed during the relevant period. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 11:46 am
Supreme Court today issued its decision in NASA v. [read post]
22 Dec 2017, 7:06 am
Janus v. [read post]
20 May 2013, 12:57 am
Brady v. [read post]
23 Apr 2009, 5:05 am
On the other hand, the State noted that the juror's son and husband were African-American men who felt they had been pulled over by police due to racial profiling. [read post]
20 Apr 2007, 4:22 am
He made it clear in his Stenberg dissent that he felt that O'Connor and Souter stabbed him in the back and misapplied Casey's undue burden standard. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 10:33 am
” Here is the Virginia AG’s statement: Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli has decided not to join other states in an amicus brief on behalf of Albert Snyder in Snyder v. [read post]
3 Oct 2024, 5:00 am
in the case of Bywater v. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 12:00 am
Civish, 382 F.3d 969, 973 (9th Cir. 2004) (failure to state a claim and Eleventh Amendment immunity); Olsen v. [read post]
11 Feb 2007, 4:30 pm
United States v. [read post]
20 Aug 2010, 5:46 pm
Martin Co. v. [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 7:28 am
” This appears to be the first endorsement by an appellate court of the approach taken by Mr Justice Mitting on this issue in the case of TLT v (1) The Secretary of State for the Home Department and (2) The Home Office [2016] EWHC 2217. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 6:55 am
In Mayer v. [read post]
31 Jan 2016, 2:38 am
Mr Sobrinho’s witness evidence stated that “as a result of the public inquiry in Portugal and the coverage it received” he felt “that I have achieved all that I could expect to have achieved through proceedings there, perhaps more“. [read post]
4 May 2009, 10:17 am
" Justice Alito also concurred in part and in the judgment, because he felt that the Court’s point about ordinary English usage was overstated and that context was always the paramount indicator of meaning. [read post]
