Search for: "State v. Holder"
Results 901 - 920
of 8,247
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Sep 2020, 1:44 am
Background The UK Supreme Court delivered the landmark judgment on Unwired Planet v Huawei and Conversant v Huawei and ZTE, [2020] UKSC 37 on 26 Aug 2020. [read post]
Myong Nam Kim v. Board of Liquor License Commissioners for Baltimore City (Md. Ct. of Spec. Appeals)
3 Jan 2023, 6:00 am
BeachleySummary: Three Class B-D-7 beer, wine, and liquor license holders (the “Licensees”) in Baltimore City (the “City”) were cited for violating a statute that (i) allowed Class B beer, wine, and liquor license holders in a certain area of the City to exchange their licenses for Class B-D-7 licenses, provided that the license holder executed a memorandum of understanding with a local community association; and (ii) restricted the hours of… [read post]
21 Jun 2006, 4:38 am
Why Wolverine should never scratch his nose…Marvel Enterprises, Inc. et al. v. [read post]
28 Dec 2012, 11:44 am
In United States v. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 8:47 am
As Moncrieffe v. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 8:49 am
In Park v Nichols, 2011 Ga. [read post]
4 Apr 2022, 6:49 am
OPPO/OPPO v. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 6:05 am
However, in Rucho v. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 12:01 pm
In the other case, however, Martinez v. [read post]
1 May 2009, 5:21 pm
Circuit Court of Appeals ruling in Mohamed v. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 9:44 am
Guo, a citizen of the People’s Republic of China, islawfully present in the United States on an F-1 studentvisa. [read post]
12 Feb 2014, 4:32 pm
The article includes a link to Attorney General Eric Holder’s declaration in Ibrahim v. [read post]
5 Apr 2007, 9:57 pm
’” See Laws v. [read post]
23 Jul 2014, 5:12 am
He also noted that[e]ven Tolliver's trial counsel stated in an affidavit: `I did not know that Ms. [read post]
18 Dec 2007, 7:18 pm
” eBay Inc. v. [read post]
18 May 2022, 9:01 pm
That was the knock, of course, on the infamous (and thoroughly discredited) Bush v. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 4:49 am
In Continental Automotive GmbH et al v. iBiquity Digital Corporation, the plaintiff held a license from the patent holder. [read post]
18 Mar 2022, 5:19 am
“Plaintiff’s legal malpractice claim was correctly dismissed in accordance with CPLR 3211(a)(7) for failure to state a cause of action. [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 7:22 am
However, this failure to update direct insurance procurement tax laws may literally prove costly, as illustrated under the recently decided New Jersey Tax Court case, Johnson & Johnson v. [read post]
28 Jun 2015, 3:48 pm
Mandate-holders may send letters to States seeking information about legal, policy or structural developments, submitting observations, or following-up on recommendations. [read post]
