Search for: "Wells v. State"
Results 9301 - 9320
of 66,706
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jan 2015, 5:47 am
State v. [read post]
16 May 2016, 6:30 am
The provision was quite detailed, including specifics about proximity of local relocation distance limits as well as out of state relocation requiring agreement of the parties or court order. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 1:15 pm
Gislaved Gummi AB, 178 F.3d 257, 263-264 (C.A.4 1999) (citing cases); Wells v. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 3:34 pm
Prior to Marathon Entertainment v. [read post]
20 Nov 2010, 9:19 am
[Post by Venkat] Lenz. v. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 11:06 am
The judge stated, “The prejudicial nature of this testimony accusing MGA of racist cultural appropriation cannot be understated. [read post]
20 Nov 2009, 7:14 pm
" [of the result]I first scoured the majority opinion, written by Ginsburg, looking for how the court would distinguish the principle in this case from the principle in [United States v. [read post]
28 Sep 2016, 8:39 am
Dickstein Shapiro, No. 16-305 (Does the fact that the search-system is no longer patentable under Alice Corp excuse patent prosecutors from alleged prosecution errors made well prior to that decision – the patent). [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 9:12 am
As As Levine, Safer, and Lench nicely state it, "[i]n the same way, updating a map when new roads are built makes it more accurate. [read post]
21 Aug 2008, 5:00 am
United States, 729 F.2d 765, 772 (Fed. [read post]
6 May 2019, 12:26 pm
Int’l, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 6:05 am
John Fund v. [read post]
2 May 2008, 10:52 am
Schlesinger made the peculiar remark, to an audience which contained many foreign lawyers, that "making available" has been well established in United States copyright law for over 10 years. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 10:00 am
Here is a copy of the decision in PDF: Maher v. [read post]
25 Nov 2016, 12:35 pm
Indianapolis, Indiana – Plaintiff Heartland Consumer Products LLC of Carmel, Indiana filed an intellectual property lawsuit in the Southern District of Indiana alleging trademark and trade dress infringement, trademark dilution and unfair competition under the Lanham Act, as well as related wrongdoing under the Indiana State Trademark Act, the common law of the State of Indiana and the Indiana Crime Victims Act. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 1:01 am
This is clearly out of line with the well-known principle, stemming from Ezelin v France, that no one should lose their right to protest peacefully simply because others are violent. [read post]
5 Mar 2008, 5:53 pm
Interesting application of State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. [read post]
12 Sep 2018, 11:44 am
Thus, for practical purposes, NYC employers with 15 or more employees, who are required to provide training under New York State law by no later than January 1, 2019, should make sure such training satisfies the New York City requirements as well. [read post]
12 Sep 2018, 11:44 am
Thus, for practical purposes, NYC employers with 15 or more employees, who are required to provide training under New York State law by no later than January 1, 2019, should make sure such training satisfies the New York City requirements as well. [read post]
6 Oct 2021, 1:04 pm
The case, United States v. [read post]
