Search for: "Study v. State" Results 9321 - 9340 of 15,016
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Dec 2012, 12:01 pm
However, if a mark was registered or applied for before the dates of accession of new Member States, then the relevant territory, and therefore relevant public, is made up only of the States that composed the EU at the relevant time (Art. 165(4)(a)). [read post]
12 Dec 2015, 7:09 am by Elina Saxena
Ben alerted us to the European Court of Human Rights’ opinion in Roman Zakharov v. [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 1:25 pm
– Discussion of IPFrontline.com article ‘Understanding Intellectual Property Value’: (IP finance), How to make sure your IP strategy plan is not doomed to failure: (IP Asset Maximizer Blog) Improve venture capital returns with IP portfolio management: (Ezine @rticles)   Global - Trade Marks / Domain Names / Brands Trade mark strategy – counterintuitive names: (IP Thinktank), ICANN Intellectual Property Constituency paper on sunrise mechanisms for… [read post]
31 Dec 2019, 12:41 pm
According to a recent study by researchers at Cornell University and Microsoft, software programs in the workplace, where diversity is a stated goal, may already be pursuing goals that are vastly over-simplified, thereby perpetuating bias. . . . [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 7:13 am by admin
Day, “Statistical Methods in Cancer Research,” in The Analysis of Case-Control Studies 36 (IARC Pub. [read post]
—PART V— Not all Native Advertising May Be Commercial Speech under the First Amendment If there is one thing clear from the case law, it is that the commercial speech analysis under the First Amendment is a fact intensive one that does not clearly lend itself to bright lines, especially when dealing with mixed commercial and noncommercial speech. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 5:27 am
 The second is whether diverging legal frameworks between Member States hamper the principle of free movement of goods. [read post]
14 Feb 2010, 7:08 pm by Diversity Insight
By Jennifer Barrera The Commission on the Status of Women is a state agency founded in 1965 to study issues affecting women and to advise the California Legislature and state agencies on inequities in laws, practices, and conditions that affect women. [read post]
2 May 2012, 7:22 pm by Schachtman
  Without explication, Judge Moss stated that Judge Altanoga’s reasoning and conclusions, reached under federal law, were “very persuasive” under Frye. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 11:29 am by Jim Gerl
  In the last installment, I discussed the seminal decision of TK & SK ex rel LK v. [read post]
20 May 2010, 12:13 pm
Perhaps the debate in the United States can reignite our efforts to better understand what is happening at the international level. [read post]