Search for: "CO.1. Means" Results 9341 - 9360 of 16,743
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jun 2014, 2:42 pm by Michael Lowe
There may be many other unindicted co-defendants or at large co-defendants whose names are still under seal, the government doesn’t want anyone to find out about. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 10:00 am
You have three options: (1) you can voluntarily join your co-worker's case if the Notice Period has not expired; (2) you can file your own case regardless of what your coworker is doing in his case; or (3) you can choose not to participate in a lawsuit against your employer but this means you cannot recover damages. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 11:15 am by openlaws
EU Project openlaws is an EU project which is co-financed by the European Union. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 11:15 am by openlaws
EU Project openlaws is an EU project which is co-financed by the European Union. [read post]
15 Jun 2014, 7:19 pm
Saturday July 12, 20147:00-8:30 am Registration and continental breakfast – generously sponsored by LexisNexis8:30-8:45 am Welcome Remarks: Jean O’Grady, PLL Chair and Marcia Burris and Cheryl Niemeier, Summit Co-chairs.8:45-10:15 am Keynote Address – Re-engineering Law Firm Librarians - Susan Hackett, Founder, Legal Executive Leadership - generously sponsored by Wolters Kluwer10:15-10:30 am Coffee break – generously sponsored by Fastcase10:30-11:45 am Morning… [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 7:27 am by Matt Bouchard
  Breaking into a new trade likely means less subcontract negotiation wiggle-room. 4. [read post]
11 Jun 2014, 12:09 pm by Peter Thompson & Associates
Not only do the immediate victims suffer, but their families, their co-workers, their communities. [read post]
11 Jun 2014, 11:45 am by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Even if a Covered Entity or business associate completed the updates required to comply with the Omnibus Final Rule, however, recent supplemental guidance published by OCR means that most organizations now have even more work to do on HIPAA compliance. [read post]
11 Jun 2014, 4:42 am by Kevin LaCroix
  The insured’s insurance policy ran for the period from January 1, 2006 to January 1, 2007. [read post]
11 Jun 2014, 4:00 am by Steve Vladeck
What makes this pair of cases unique, though, is that this time, it is the PMCs that are asking the Court to intervene, arguing that: (1) these disputes present non-justiciable political questions; (2) even if the disputes are justiciable, the PMCs are entitled to “derivative sovereign immunity”; and (3) even if they are not immune from state tort law, state tort law is “preempted” by federal law. [read post]