Search for: "United States v. California" Results 9341 - 9360 of 13,840
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Dec 2021, 10:57 pm by Florian Mueller
"Apple's smartphone market share in the Netherlands (26%) is far lower than in the United States, and the Dutch ACM very appropriately explains that mobile app developers are facing an Apple-Google duopoly (without using that term--at least I couldn't find in the summary).Finally, here's the Coring v. [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 1:58 pm
By Jeff Pietsch and Fabiola Larios In a 4 to 4 split per curiam decision, the United States Supreme Court recently affirmed the judgment of the Ninth Circuit’s opinion in Omega S.A. v. [read post]
29 Aug 2010, 8:03 pm by Public Protection Lawyer
The United States District Court for Eastern California threw Alexis out of Court and she appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. [read post]
6 Dec 2011, 11:56 am by David Lat
” With ‘Deep Regret,’ Lindsey Judge Issues Final Order [FCPA Blog] Lindsey Case Showed Value of Constitutional Protections [FCPA Blog] Judge Slams FBI, Prosecutors For Misconduct in Bribery Case [Forbes] Matz: Pretty Soon You’re Talking Misconduct [Simple Justice] United States v. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
Common Cause investigated how the religious right fought for the deregulation of political spending, and won in Citizens United v. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 7:16 am by J. Gordon Hylton
This means that both Alaska and California would have the same one vote, and 26 votes would be necessary to elect a president. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 7:19 am by John Jascob
SEC, the Supreme Court held in a 7-2 decision that the SEC’s administrative law judges (“ALJ”) are “officers of the United States,” and thereby subject to the Appointments Clause of the Constitution. [read post]
10 Aug 2022, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar and Jason Mazzone
The federal law was clearly (indeed obviously) unconstitutional under Johnson, and the Supreme Court so held in 1990 in United States v. [read post]
15 Jul 2017, 5:11 am
The summary stated that the Supreme Court allows Eli Lilly's appeal and holds that Actavis' products directly infringe Eli Lilly's patent in the United Kingdom, France, Italy and Spain. [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 5:52 pm by John Bellinger
   This morning the Supreme Court granted cert in DaimlerChrysler AG v Bauman, an ATS suit against Daimler. [read post]
26 Jul 2021, 4:12 am by Michael Douglas
There were three consequences of this removal: first, Fortnite could not be downloaded to an Apple device; secondly, previously installed iOS versions of Fortnite could not be updated; and, thirdly, Apple device users could not play against players who had the latest version of Fortnite.[22] 4         The Proceedings On the same day as Apple removed Fortnite from the App Store, Epic commenced antitrust proceedings in the United States… [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 11:47 am by Aaron Pelley
http://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/289052.opn.doc.pdf Federal Law United States Supreme Court Bond v. [read post]
22 Sep 2008, 7:59 pm
First, a possible solution is the application of the Coase Theorem, which is well-known to lawyers through its application in United States v. [read post]