Search for: "United States v. John"
Results 9341 - 9360
of 11,601
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 May 2011, 1:35 am
Iorworth HOARE v the United Kingdom – 16261/08 [2011] ECHR 722 (12 April 2011) Convicted sex offender and lottery winner loses Euro human rights appeal against post limitation date. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 9:04 am
United States, in which a commercial fisherman was prosecuted under the federal Sarbanes-Oxley Act for destroying undersized fish, and the amicus brief that Cato filed in the case. [read post]
23 Dec 2022, 5:09 am
Oldham wrote in September 2022 that social media companies do not have a right to “muzzle” free speech and act more like common carriers that are “central public forums for public debate and have enjoyed governmental support in the United States. [read post]
20 Aug 2010, 2:59 am
Any improvement, Stearns says, will come from the USDA, FDA, and United States legislature. [read post]
16 Jul 2016, 1:48 pm
Garrison Architects v. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 3:25 am
Board of Education: the idea is that the Supreme Court supported Brown because it served the United States’ cold war agenda of supporting human rights. [read post]
10 Mar 2018, 8:44 pm
Indeed, in the 1936 case of United States v. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 8:40 am
In what was the most politically charged case since Bush v. [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 1:50 pm
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES 38. [read post]
31 Mar 2012, 8:16 am
I do not believe that we should participate in this utterly empty gesture.United States v. [read post]
28 Aug 2019, 7:20 am
See McPherson v. [read post]
15 May 2010, 2:22 pm
Following a bench trial, the district court concluded that Taltech inventor John Wong engaged in inequitable conduct during prosecution of the '779 patent before the United States Patent and Trademark Office ("PTO") when he did not disclose a raincoat seam that included heat-fusible adhesive tape (undisclosed raincoat seam, "URS"), and when he misrepresented a raincoat seam previously made and sold by TAL ("double top-stitch… [read post]
28 Mar 2017, 4:32 pm
In response to these stories as well as subsequent media reports, the company issued statements denying the news reports and stating that all Eletrobras units and employees respect the principles in the company’s code of ethics. [read post]
25 Aug 2010, 8:26 pm
"The responsibility of the state to provide exculpatory evidence to the defense was articulated in the 1963 Supreme Court ruling in Brady v. [read post]
16 Mar 2007, 10:35 am
Laeser,Contrary to your assertion, the State of Florida v. [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 5:01 am
The second period represents a time of flux for privilege as the executive branch wrestles with the fallout from Watergate and attempts to interpret and apply United States v. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 4:26 am
Farah v. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 12:00 pm
On Dec. 7, one week before the fake electoral votes were cast, District Judge Linda V. [read post]
21 Jan 2018, 4:51 pm
Scotland The Sunday Herald has a column by Angela Haggerty entitled “The Scottish Law Commission’s draft defamation bill matters to all social media users” United States The Columbia Journalism Review has a piece entitled “Can Trump change the nation’s libel laws? [read post]
30 Aug 2024, 5:06 pm
”The False Claims Act imposes treble damages and penalties on those who knowingly and falsely claim money from the United States or knowingly fail to pay money owed to the United States. [read post]
