Search for: "Ames v. Ames"
Results 9361 - 9380
of 28,722
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jul 2016, 12:37 pm
If it's a plausible interpretation -- and I am of the slight view that it is -- and it's a better one (which I definitely think is true), then I may be on board for it.Not only do I think this is what the Legislature would have intended had they thought of this exact fact pattern, but this alternative interpretation also avoids some crazy line-drawing absurdities. [read post]
11 Jul 2016, 11:16 am
See Jacobellis v. [read post]
11 Jul 2016, 9:12 am
Frankly, I am not persuaded by that argument. [read post]
11 Jul 2016, 4:00 am
” Am. [read post]
8 Jul 2016, 12:22 pm
No, ma’am. q. [read post]
8 Jul 2016, 9:20 am
A few weeks ago, the Georgia Court of Appeals handed down an interesting decision in Baskin v. [read post]
8 Jul 2016, 4:39 am
The free event will run from 8 – 10 am at the Cleveland East DoubleTree, and 2 hours of HRCI credits are pending. [read post]
8 Jul 2016, 4:00 am
Recently, in Eurocopter v. [read post]
7 Jul 2016, 10:33 pm
In coming to this conclusion the Hoge Raad quoted extensively from the standards developed by the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) in 2013 in Vinter and others v United Kingdom and in 2016 in Murray v The Netherlands but then set them out and developed them further in its own words. [read post]
7 Jul 2016, 4:13 pm
Teaching academic, author of acclaimed defamation law textbooks, leading media law barrister in Australia and the UK, Dr Matt Collins QC packs a lot into his day … He agreed to spare some of his time to discuss defamation, privacy, celebrity, journalists’ sources, and free speech, just for starters GLJ: I wanted to start by asking you what you see as the major flaws in Australian defamation law, and how you might go about correcting them. [read post]
7 Jul 2016, 11:47 am
” This is inconsistent with D.C. v. [read post]
7 Jul 2016, 9:30 am
So why am I touting the July 10-13 event today? [read post]
7 Jul 2016, 7:33 am
By way of background, the highly publicized Pro-Football Inc. v. [read post]
7 Jul 2016, 4:46 am
And who am I to judge whether beer qualifies as a meal? [read post]
7 Jul 2016, 3:18 am
However, I am not affiliated with the firm.] [read post]
7 Jul 2016, 3:08 am
In Isabel R. v. [read post]
6 Jul 2016, 2:21 pm
The post Utah v. [read post]
6 Jul 2016, 2:21 pm
The post Utah v. [read post]
6 Jul 2016, 11:00 am
I've previously blogged about the appalling decision by the Tax Court in Altera v. [read post]
6 Jul 2016, 5:21 am
Life Care Ctrs. of Am., Inc. [read post]
